Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the analysis

From: Severely malnourished children with a low weight-for-height have similar mortality to those with a low mid-upper-arm-circumference: II. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Ref

Study

Author & year

Country

Settinga

Study design

Prospect Retrosp

Date of data

MUAC stand

WHZ stand

Age range

Oed

Oed cases

“Both” in study

“Both” in survey

Time obs

Missing data

Default or lost

Original analysis

#

#

     

year

mm

Z or %

month

 

%

%

%

d.m

%

%

 

Studies giving numbers of children fulfilling both WHZ and MUAC criteria

 41

1

Aguayo 2015

India

IPF

Case notes

Retrosp

2009–11

< 115

<− 3 WHO

6–59

excl

 

63.9

21.3

14 d

ng

22.9

Log reg

 42

2

Grellety 2012

Niger

Com

Com trial

Prospect

2010

< 115

<−3 WHO

6–23

excl

 

35.1

24.9

5 m

5.3

0.0

Cox PH reg

 21

3

Grellety 2015

South Sudan

OTP

Case notes

Retrosp

2008

< 115

<−3 WHO

6–59

excl

 

31.7

20.3

51 d

8.6

15.0

Binom reg

 43

4

Isanaka 2015

Niger

OTP

RCT

Prospect

2012–3

< 115

<−3 WHO

6–59

excl

 

39.2

24.9

29.5 d

0.0

1.0

Log-binom

 44

5

Lowlaavar 2016

Uganda

IPF

Cohort

Prospect

2012–3

< 115

<−3 WHO

6–60

excl

 

22.5

11.6

3 d

ng

9.7

Log reg

 45

6

LaCourse 2014

Malawi

IPF

Case notes

Prospect

2011–2

< 110

< 70% NCHS

6–60

excl

 

14.2

8.8

ng

0.5

0.0

Chisq OR

 35

7

Olofin 2016

DRC,Senegal,Nepal

Com

Com cohort

Prospect

1983–92

< 115

<−3 WHO

6–59

excl

 

21.9

20,12,7

2–6 m

ng

ng

Cox PH reg

Studies including oedema

 46

8

Berkley 2005

Kenya

IPF

Case notes

Prospect

1999–02

< 115

<−3 NCHS

12–59

incl

34.2

42.9

8.8b

ng

3.6

ng

ROC curve

 47

9

Chiabi 2017

Cameroun

IPF

Case notes

Retrosp

2006–14

< 115

<− 3 WHO

6–59

incl

ng

58.5

17.0

ng

30.7

10.1

ROC curve

 48

10

Sachdeva 2016

India

IPF

Case notes

Prospect

2012–3

< 115

<−3 WHO

6–60

incl

3.8

32.2

21.3

3.7 d

ng

15.0

ROC curve

Studies where children fulfilling both criteria are incorporated into both the WHZ and MUAC categories

 49

11

Burza 2016

India

Com

Follow up

Prospect

2009–11

< 115

<−3 WHO

6–59

ng

ng

ng

21.3

18 m

26.7

ng

Log reg

 50

12

Mogeni 2011

Kenya

IPF

Case notes

Prospect

2007–9

< 115

<−3 WHO

6–60

incl

19.2

ng

8.8b

ng

5.4

ng

Chisq

 51

13

Sylla 2015

Senegal

IPF

Case notes

Retrosp

2012

< 115

<− 3 WHO

0–60

ng

ng

ng

6.6

ng

ng

ng

Log reg

 52

14

Vella 1990

Uganda

Com

Com cohort

Prospect

1988

< 115

<−3 NCHS

0–60

incl

ng

ng

11.6

ng

13.0

10.0

Log reg

 53

15

Dramaix 1993

DRC

IPF

Case notes

Prospect

1986–8

< 115

< 70% NCHS

0–60

incl

28.9

ng

11.5

60 d

15.4

ng

Log reg

 54

16

Girum 2017

Ethiopia

IPF

Case notes

Retrosp

2013–5

< 115

< 70% ng

ng

incl

66.6

ng

15.5

13 d

ng

11.6

Cox PH reg

 55

17

Savadogo 2007

BFA

IPF

Case notes

Retrosp

1999–03

Tertile

<−3 NCHS

0- < 36

excl

ng

ng

18.3

19 d

ng

18.3

Cox PH reg

 36

18

Garenne1987

Senegal

Com

Com cohort

Prospect

1983–4

< 115

<−3 NCHS

1–60

incl

ng

ng

6.6

3 m

ng

ng

Life table

 37

19

Garenne 2009

Senegal

Com

Com cohort

Prospect

1983–4

< 110

CDC2000

1–60

incl

ng

ng

6.6

3 m

ng

ng

Life table

 37

20

Garenne 2009

DRC

Com

Com cohort

Prospect

1989–92

< 110

CDC2000

1–60

incl

ng

ng

11.5

6 m

ng

ng

Life table

 38

21

VD Broeck 1993

DRC

Com

Com cohort

Prospect

1989–92

<−4 SD

<−3 NCHS

0–60

incl

ng

ng

11.5

3 m

ng

ng

Life table

  1. a For brief description of each study and comments please see Additional File 2
  2. b These studies were on the Kenya coast and the nutritional survey was from North Kenya
  3. DRC Democratic Republic of Congo (COD), BFA Burkina Faso, IPF In-patient Facility, Com community study, OTP Out-patient treatment program, RCT randomized controlled trial, Retrosp retrospective, Prospect prospective, stand standards used to define SAM, WHO World Health Organisation 2006 WHZ standards, NCHS National Center for Health Statistics 1996 standards, CDC2000 Centre for Disease Control 2000 standards, Oed oedematous cases (kwashiorkor and marasmic-kwashiorkor), excl excluded from analysis, incl included in analysis, ng not given in report, “Both” in study the proportion of all the SAM cases which had both WHZ < − 3Z and MUAC < 115 mm in the study’s subjects, “Both” in survey the proportion of all SAM cases that had both WHZ < − 3Z and MUAC < 115 mm derived from a nutritional survey of a random sample of the community (see [21]), obs average time the subjects were observed to determine the outcome, d.m days or months, log logistic, reg regression, Binom binomial, PH Proportional Hazards, Chisq Chi-squared Test, OR odds ratio. Non-standard definitions of SAM and age ranges not within the 6-60 month age range are shown in bold script.