Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of changes in adiposity within groups between baseline and six-month follow-up

From: Family-based intervention using face-to-face sessions and social media to improve Malay primary school children’s adiposity: a randomized controlled field trial of the Malaysian REDUCE programme

 

Mean difference ± SD baseline vs 6-monthc

t

p-value a

BMI z-score

 Whole sample

  Intervention group (n = 67)

0.100 ± 0.257

3.190

0.002b

  Wait-list group (n = 67)

0.019 ± 0.172

0.907

0.368

 Overweight children

  Intervention group (n = 28)

0.087 ± 0.367

1.257

0.220

  Wait-list group (n = 27)

− 0.067 ± 0.185

−1.887

0.070

 Obese children

  Intervention group (n = 39)

0.109 ± 0.136

5.022

< 0.001b

  Wait-list group (n = 40)

0.077 ± 0.138

3.545

0.001b

Waist circumference percentile

 Whole sample

  Intervention group (n = 67)

1.373 ± 11.079

1.014

0.314

  Wait-list group (n = 67)

−1.343 ± 9.019

−1.219

0.227

 Overweight children

  Intervention group (n = 28)

5.357 ± 14.095

2.011

0.054

  Wait-list group (n = 27)

0.963 ± 9.382

0.533

0.598

 Obese children

  Intervention group (n = 39)

−1.487 ± 7.207

−1.289

0.205

  Wait-list group (n = 40)

− 2.900 ± 8.533

−2.149

0.038b

Percentage of total body fat

 Whole sample

  Intervention group (n = 67)

0.912 ± 6.053

1.234

0.222

  Wait-list group (n = 67)

0.655 ± 6.694

0.801

0.426

 Overweight children

  Intervention group (n = 28)

2.451 ± 6.736

1.926

0.065

  Wait-list group (n = 27)

1.963 ± 5.961

1.711

0.099

 Obese children

  Intervention group (n = 39)

−0.193 ± 5.330

−0.226

0.822

  Wait-list group (n = 40)

−0.227 ± 7.083

−0.203

0.840

  1. aUsing paired t-test; SD: standard deviation
  2. bSignificant at p ≤ 0.05;
  3. cThis difference is baseline minus 6 month, with minus value depicting a higher measurement at 6-month post-training compared to baseline