Examining the validity and utility of two secondary sources of food environment data against street audits in England

Table 8 Odds of true positive relative to false negative (sensitivity odds) for FSA data

Environment/Outlet Type	Model 1			Model 2			Model 3			Model 3 (urban only)			Model 3 (rural only)
Environment/Outlet Type	OR	95% CI		OR	95% CI		OR	95% CI		OR	95% CI		OR	95% CI
Urban	REF						REF
Rural	1.27	0.86	1.88				2.23 ¹	1.21	4.28
Deprived				REF			REF			REF			REF
Middle				0.87	0.53	1.38	1.09	0.66	1.87	1.03	0.53	1.96	0.49 ¹	0.24	0.97
Affluent				0.85	0.52	1.36	1.01	0.57	1.77	0.94	0.49	1.77	0.60	0.29	1.26
Restaurant							REF			REF			REF
Pub							0.41 ²	0.21	0.82	0.24 ³	0.10	0.56	1.26	0.37	5.85
Café							0.56 ¹	0.34	0.92	0.47 ¹	0.25	0.89	0.76	0.33	1.75
Fast Food							1.17	0.69	1.98	0.92	0.47	1.79	1.75	0.73	4.40
Supermarket							1.45	0.64	3.73	0.97	0.38	2.85	4.13	0.77	76.60
Convenience							0.46 ²	0.26	0.83	0.36 ²	0.17	0.77	0.68	0.27	1.75
Speciality							0.38 ³	0.21	0.67	0.27 ³	0.13	0.56	0.68	0.27	1.76
Rural x Middle							0.43 ¹	0.17	0.98
Rural x Affluent							0.53	0.21	1.30

Note. OR Odds ratio. CI Confidence interval. REF: Reference category. All models are multi-level models accounting for nesting of outlets within LSOAs
¹ p < 0.05, ² p < 0.01, ³ p < 0.001

ISSN: 1475-2891