Open Peer Review Reports for: Behaviors of consumers, physicians and pharmacists in response to adverse events associated with dietary supplement use
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 18 Nov 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Evan Cherniack |
| 12 Jan 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rui Zhang |
| 26 Jan 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Tsuyoshi Chiba |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 26 Jan 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 6 Feb 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Evan Cherniack |
| 14 Feb 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Tsuyoshi Chiba |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 14 Feb 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 24 Feb 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Tsuyoshi Chiba |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 24 Feb 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 7 Mar 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 18 Mar 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12937-017-0239-4 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
