Skip to main content

Table 6 Adjusted R2 values for regression of total percent body fat and logAndroid fat mass on metabolic risk factors

From: Comparison of direct measures of adiposity with indirect measures for assessing cardiometabolic risk factors in preadolescent girls

%total body fat + logAndroid fat mass

 

n

Model Adjusted R2

logHOMA-IR

234

0.45

logTG

269

0.17

logHDL

269

0.19

logLDL

269

0.04

  1. All models adjusted for ethnicity and maturity offset
  2. HOMA-IR homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, TG triglycerides, HDL-C high density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dL), LDL-C low density cholesterol (mg/dL)