Skip to main content

Table 6 Adjusted R2 values for regression of total percent body fat and logAndroid fat mass on metabolic risk factors

From: Comparison of direct measures of adiposity with indirect measures for assessing cardiometabolic risk factors in preadolescent girls

%total body fat + logAndroid fat mass
  n Model Adjusted R2
logHOMA-IR 234 0.45
logTG 269 0.17
logHDL 269 0.19
logLDL 269 0.04
  1. All models adjusted for ethnicity and maturity offset
  2. HOMA-IR homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, TG triglycerides, HDL-C high density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dL), LDL-C low density cholesterol (mg/dL)
Back to article page