Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A review of total & added sugar intakes and dietary sources in Europe

  • Véronique Azaïs-Braesco1Email author,
  • Diewertje Sluik2,
  • Matthieu Maillot3,
  • Frans Kok2 and
  • Luis A. Moreno4
Nutrition Journal201716:6

Received: 13 July 2016

Accepted: 25 December 2016

Published: 21 January 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
13 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Gangwisch
26 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luc Tappy
13 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Veronique Braesco
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Dec 2016 Editorially accepted
21 Jan 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12937-016-0225-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University and Research
GENUD (Growth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development) Research Group, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (IIS Aragón), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), University of Zaragoza