Data quality and practical challenges of thyroid volume assessment by ultrasound under field conditions - observer errors may affect prevalence estimates of goitre
© Henjum et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 20 March 2010
Accepted: 14 December 2010
Published: 14 December 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Mar 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pieter Jooste|
|7 May 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ingvild Dalen|
|28 Sep 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Sigrun Henjum|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Sep 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pieter Jooste|
|13 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ingvild Dalen|
|2 Dec 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Sigrun Henjum|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Dec 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Dec 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Sigrun Henjum|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|12 Dec 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|14 Dec 2010||Editorially accepted|
|14 Dec 2010||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-9-66|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.