This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Nutrient adequacy during weight loss interventions: a randomized study in women comparing the dietary intake in a meal replacement group with a traditional food group
- Judith M Ashley†1Email author,
- Holly Herzog†1,
- Sharon Clodfelter†2,
- Vicki Bovee†3,
- Jon Schrage†4 and
- Chris Pritsos†1
© Ashley et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 28 December 2006
Accepted: 25 June 2007
Published: 25 June 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Dec 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judy Driskell|
|29 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jamy Ard|
|15 May 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Judith Ashley|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 May 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 May 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jamy Ard|
|12 Jun 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Judith Ashley|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Jun 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Jun 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Judith Ashley|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 Jun 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Jun 2007||Editorially accepted|
|25 Jun 2007||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-6-12|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.