Skip to main content

Table 2 Correlation coefficient matrix between VFA CT and predictor variables in the modeling group ( n = 152)

From: The study of anthropometric estimates in the visceral fat of healthy individuals

  VFACT ARS1 AS1 SUS1 BS1 WC CS1 WHR SS1 Age CHS1 BMI TS1 HC THS1 CAS1 Wt Sex
ARS 1 .81**                  
AS 1 .80** .86**                 
SUS 1 .76** .82** .78**                
BS 1 .76** .83** .80** .92**               
WC .75** .63** .56** .57** .58**              
CS 1 .74** .84** .80** .80** .74** .44**             
WHR .74** .64** .58** .59** .55** .80** .54**            
SS 1 .72** .76** .83** .73** .74** .48** .74** .48**           
Age .70** .60** .67** .62** .56** .28** .79** .42** .68**          
CHS 1 .66** .76** .74** .73** .73** .48** .72** .50** .72** .54**         
BMI .63** .57** .46** .50** .54** .87** .34** .56** .37** .16** .43**        
TS 1 .57** .68** .69** .66** .59** .31** .74** .37** .56** .37** .16 .43**       
HC .54** .44** .38** .38** .44** .87** .22** .39** .34** .09 .31** .86** .16*      
THS 1 .49** .59** .65** .61** .56** .25** .69** .34** .69** .64** .66** .11 .77** .10     
CAS 1 .45** .54** .61** .55** .50** .20* .67** .28** .65** .62** .61** .10 .74** .07 .85**    
Wt .44** .38** .22** .35** .35** .77** .15 .44** .12 -.02 .18* .84** .09 .81** -.10 -.08   
Sex -.06 -.06 -.23** .01 -.07 .06 -.07 .10 -.31** -.14 -.26** .15 -.11 .01 -37** -.22** .48**  
Ht -.13 -.18* -.30** -.13 -.18* .12 -.24** -.05 -.35** -.27** -.34** .06 -.23** .23** -.38** -.33** .58** .66**
  1. 1subcutaneous fat thickness; AS: abdominal skinfold, SS: suprailiac skinfold, ARS: armpit skinfold, TS: triceps skinfold, BS: back skinfold, SUS: subscapula skinfold, THS: thigh skinfold, CS: chest skinfold, CAS: calf skinfold, CHS: chin skinfold; WC: waist circumference; HC: hip circumference; WHR: waist-to-hip ration; Sex(0: female, 1: male); Ht, height; Wt, weight; BMI, body mass index; *, **.Correlation is significant at the 0.05, 0.01 level (2-tailed).