Skip to main content

Table 5 Agreement between INTERVIEW and OBSERVATION (n = 26)

From: Validity and relative validity of a novel digital approach for 24-h dietary recall in athletes

 

INTERVIEW mean ± SD

OBSERVATION mean ± SD

% Mean difference (95% CI)

p-value for % Mean difference

ICC (95% CI)

p-value for ICC

Energy (kcal)

3266 ± 1388

3042 ± 1262

6.4 (-2.7 to 16.2)

0.165

0.92 (0.83-0.97)

0.000

Carbohydrate (g)

436 ± 198

426 ± 159

0.8 (-8.2 to 10.6)

0.866

0.91 (0.80-0.96)

0.000

Protein (g)

143 ± 61

139 ± 63

6.4 (-5.4 to 19.5)

0.287

0.92 (0.82-0.96)

0.000

Total Fat (g)

110 ± 54

91 ± 53

26.0 (8.2 to 46.7)*

0.005

0.83 (0.54-0.93)

0.000

Water (mL)

4039 ± 1209

4212 ± 1275

-4.9 (-12.6 to 3.5)

0.232

0.86 (0.70-0.94)

0.000

Sodium (mg)

4507 ± 2504

4254 ± 2117

1.2 (-10.6 to 14.5)

0.849

0.92 (0.82-0.96)

0.000

Calcium (mg)

1192 ± 635

1052 ± 566

15.3 (-1.6 to 35.0)

0.075

0.88 (0.74-0.95)

0.000

Iron (mg)

20.3 ± 9.9

18.0 ± 8.0

12.2 (-0.5 to 26.6)

0.059

0.90 (0.77-0.96)

0.000

  1. Data are from the 26 subjects who completed INTERVIEW and OBSERVATION in the TEST session. Values for INTERVIEW and OBSERVATION (shown as mean ± SD) are untransformed data. Paired comparisons and ICC analyses were conducted on transformed (natural log) data. Asterisks indicate where the mean differences are statistically significant. ICC p-values are listed as 0.000 because they are all less than 0.0005. INTERVIEW, 24-h dietary recall interview using USDA 5-step multiple-pass method; ICC, intraclass correlation; OBSERVATION, direct dietary observations by dietitians.