This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
U.S. adults are not meeting recommended levels for fish and omega-3 fatty acid intake: results of an analysis using observational data from NHANES 2003–2008
© Papanikolaou et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 20 September 2013
Accepted: 13 March 2014
Published: 2 April 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Sep 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roger Clemens|
|3 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Catherine Stanton|
|7 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Yanni Papanikolaou|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Yanni Papanikolaou|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|2 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|13 Mar 2014||Editorially accepted|
|2 Apr 2014||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-13-31|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.