Low fat intake is associated with pathological manifestations and poor recovery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
© Yamada et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 24 December 2012
Accepted: 4 June 2013
Published: 8 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Dec 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Teh-Ia Huo|
|16 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wenhong Cao|
|21 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Srinivasan Dasarathy|
|21 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Takehiro Okabayashi|
|24 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Akinobu Kato|
|25 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Takeshi Suda|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Akinobu Kato|
|15 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wenhong Cao|
|24 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Srinivasan Dasarathy|
|26 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Takeshi Suda|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-12-79|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.