Skip to main content

Table 3 Dietary fibre intake, faecal composition and bowel habits

From: Effects of legume kernel fibres and citrus fibre on putative risk factors for colorectal cancer: a randomised, double-blind, crossover human intervention trial

 

BG (n = 26)

WG (n = 24)

SG (n = 26)

 

Run-in

Blue lupin

Citrus

Run-in

White lupin

Citrus

Run-in

Soya

Citrus

Dietary fibre intake [g/d]

22.4 ± 6.4b

45.6 ± 5.8a

46.1 ± 8.7a

18.4 ± 5.0b

42.7 ± 6.1a

43.3 ± 5.1a

21.8 ± 5.7b

46.3 ± 5.3a

45.3 ± 5.5a

Faecal weight [g/d]

132 ± 60b

176 ± 81a

171 ± 107a

103 ± 62b

144 ± 81a

142 ±65a

135 ± 63b

156 ±73ab

173 ± 70a

Faecal dry matter

         

 [g/100 g]

27.1 ± 5.1a

24.7 ± 5.3b

24.8 ± 5.0b

28.6 ± 5.8a

26.0 ± 5.3b

25.1 ± 4.4b

26.1 ± 5.0

25.6 ± 5.1

24.9 ± 4.7

 [g/d]

34.2 ± 12.6b

40.7 ± 14.1a

38.4 ± 16.9a

28.2 ± 12.4b

35.7 ± 17.3a

35.0 ± 13.3a

33.6 ± 13.3b

38.2 ± 15.2ab

42.9 ± 18.9a

Faecal pH

6.65 ± 0.41a

6.38 ± 0.47b

6.49 ± 0.52ab

6.51 ± 0.33

6.54 ± 0.40

6.46 ± 0.40

6.42 ± 0.34

6.45 ± 0.30

6.45 ± 0.56

Transit time [d] 1

1.29 ± 0.61b

1.02 ± 0.33c

1.48 ± 0.72a

1.47 ± 0.7

1.39 ± 0.57

1.28 ± 0.49

1.28 ± 0.61

1.33 ± 0.64

1.31 ± 0.42

Bristol Stool Form Scale

3.32 ± 1.04b

3.71 ± 0.80b

3.79 ± 0.92a

3.64 ± 1.04b

4.18 ± 1.14a

4.30 ± 1.01a

3.56 ± 1.13b

4.18 ± 1.21a

4.15 ± 0.78a

Total faecal fibre [g/d]

10.3 ± 4.5b

13.3 ± 5.5a

13.8 ± 9.3a

7.59 ± 3.73b

9.77 ± 4.85a

9.98 ± 4.3a

9.63 ± 3.79b

11.4 ± 4.4ab

13.5 ± 8.7a

  1. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
  2. BG blue lupin group; WG white lupin group; SG soya group; blue lupin, Lupinus angustifolius cv. Boregine; white lupin, Lupinus albus cv. Typ Top; soya, Glycine max cv. Hefeng; citrus, citrus fibre Herbacel AQ Plus serving as active comparator.
  3. a>b>cSignificant differences between mean values within each group with unequal superscript letters (P ≤ 0.05) determined by repeated measures ANOVA.
  4. 1Oro-faecal transit time: BG (n = 24), WG (n = 20), SG (n = 20).