Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Weight Science: Evaluating the Evidence for a Paradigm Shift

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Oct 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michelle Neyman Morris
25 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dawn Clifford
17 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Lucy Aphramor
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dawn Clifford
27 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michelle Neyman Morris
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
12 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Lucy Aphramor
Resubmission - Version 6
12 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
17 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Lucy Aphramor
Resubmission - Version 8
17 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
24 Jan 2011 Editorially accepted
24 Jan 2011 Article published 10.1186/1475-2891-10-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement