Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Food for thought: an exploratory study of how physicians experience poor workplace nutrition

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Chesluk
18 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hector Baillie
13 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jane Lemaire
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Chesluk
30 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jane Lemaire
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jane Lemaire
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jane Lemaire
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
18 Feb 2011 Editorially accepted
18 Feb 2011 Article published 10.1186/1475-2891-10-18

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement