Possible benefits of tomato juice consumption: a pilot study on irradiated human lymphocytes from healthy donors
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 22 August 2016
Accepted: 1 May 2017
Published: 12 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - DM Monti|
|27 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marko Gerić|
|12 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Ayumi Nakamura|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - DM Monti|
|27 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marko Gerić|
|2 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Ayumi Nakamura|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - DM Monti|
|16 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marko Gerić|
|26 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Ayumi Nakamura|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|12 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12937-017-0248-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.