Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparison of direct measures of adiposity with indirect measures for assessing cardiometabolic risk factors in preadolescent girls

Nutrition Journal201716:15

DOI: 10.1186/s12937-017-0236-7

Received: 1 November 2016

Accepted: 13 February 2017

Published: 23 February 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ginger Nicol
12 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yana Chen
12 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Megan Hetherington-Rauth
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
13 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
23 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12937-017-0236-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona
(2)
Departments of Medicine, University of Arizona
(3)
University of Arizona Cancer Center
(4)
Department of Physiology, University of Arizona
(5)
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Shantz Building

Advertisement