Mis-reporting, previous health status and health status of family may seriously bias the association between food patterns and disease
© Hörnell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 22 March 2010
Accepted: 30 October 2010
Published: 30 October 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Mar 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 May 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elisabet Wirfält|
|24 May 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ming Li|
|16 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Agneta Hörnell|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|16 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Sep 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elisabet Wirfält|
|11 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ming Li|
|14 Oct 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Agneta Hörnell|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|14 Oct 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Oct 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Agneta Hörnell|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|28 Oct 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|30 Oct 2010||Editorially accepted|
|30 Oct 2010||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-9-48|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.