Efficacy of different strategies to treat anemia in children: a randomized clinical trial
© Rosado et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 14 October 2009
Accepted: 23 September 2010
Published: 23 September 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Oct 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Teresa Kemmer|
|26 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christine Stewart|
|28 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kerry Schulze|
|17 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Maria del C Caamaño|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kerry Schulze|
|19 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Teresa Kemmer|
|22 Jul 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Maria del C Caamaño|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Jul 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Maria del C Caamaño|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|25 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|23 Sep 2010||Editorially accepted|
|23 Sep 2010||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-9-40|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.