A novel online Food Recall Checklist for use in an undergraduate student population: a comparison with diet diaries
© Comrie et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 15 August 2008
Accepted: 19 February 2009
Published: 19 February 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|15 Aug 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Sep 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anne Chinnock|
|22 Oct 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frances Thompson|
|27 Nov 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Fiona Comrie|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Nov 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Feb 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Fiona Comrie|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|7 Feb 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|19 Feb 2009||Editorially accepted|
|19 Feb 2009||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-8-13|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.