Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The safety of PolyGlycopleX® (PGX®) as shown in a 90-day rodent feeding study

  • Ray A Matulka1Email author,
  • Michael R Lyon2, 3,
  • Simon Wood2,
  • Palma Ann Marone4,
  • Daniel J Merkel4 and
  • George A Burdock1
Contributed equally
Nutrition Journal20098:1

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-8-1

Received: 03 September 2008

Accepted: 16 January 2009

Published: 16 January 2009

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Sep 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Iain Brownlee
24 Nov 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ray Matulka
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Nov 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Iain Brownlee
14 Jan 2009 Author responded Author comments - Ray Matulka
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Jan 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
16 Jan 2009 Editorially accepted
16 Jan 2009 Article published 10.1186/1475-2891-8-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Burdock Group, 801 North Orange Avenue
(2)
Canadian Centre for Functional Medicine, 1552 United Boulevard
(3)
University of British Columbia, Food, Nutrition and Health Program
(4)
Eurofins|Product Safety Laboratories

Advertisement