To treat or not to treat: comparison of different criteria used to determine whether weight loss is to be recommended
© Colombo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 27 February 2007
Accepted: 29 January 2008
Published: 29 January 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|27 Feb 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Aug 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ross Hansen|
|19 Nov 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Ottavia Colombo|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Nov 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Dec 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Ottavia Colombo|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|6 Dec 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Dec 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Ottavia Colombo|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|20 Dec 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|16 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Ottavia Colombo|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|16 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|29 Jan 2008||Editorially accepted|
|29 Jan 2008||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-7-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.