Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effects of social approval bias on self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption: a randomized controlled trial

  • Tracy M Miller1,
  • Madiha F Abdel-Maksoud1,
  • Lori A Crane1,
  • Al C Marcus2 and
  • Tim E Byers1Email author
Nutrition Journal20087:18

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-7-18

Received: 14 November 2007

Accepted: 27 June 2008

Published: 27 June 2008

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
14 Nov 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frances Thompson
21 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Madiha Abdel-Maksoud
Resubmission - Version 3
21 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Jun 2008 Editorially accepted
27 Jun 2008 Article published 10.1186/1475-2891-7-18

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado Denver
AMC Cancer Research Center