Homocysteine and cognitive impairment; a case series in a General Practice setting
© McCaddon; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 18 January 2006
Accepted: 15 February 2006
Published: 15 February 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Jan 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Jan 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew McCaddon|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Jan 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Feb 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew McCaddon|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|14 Feb 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|15 Feb 2006||Editorially accepted|
|15 Feb 2006||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-5-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.