Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Test-retest reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and estimated effects on disease risk in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC)

  • Christine L Parr1Email author,
  • Marit B Veierød1,
  • Petter Laake1,
  • Eiliv Lund2 and
  • Anette Hjartåker1
Nutrition Journal20065:4

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-5-4

Received: 03 September 2005

Accepted: 31 January 2006

Published: 31 January 2006

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Sep 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Sep 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shoichiro Tsugane
8 Dec 2005 Author responded Author comments - Christine Louise Parr
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Dec 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Dec 2005 Author responded Author comments - Christine Louise Parr
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Dec 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
25 Jan 2006 Author responded Author comments - Christine Louise Parr
Resubmission - Version 5
25 Jan 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
31 Jan 2006 Editorially accepted
31 Jan 2006 Article published 10.1186/1475-2891-5-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Department of Biostatistics, University of Oslo
(2)
Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø

Advertisement