Test-retest reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and estimated effects on disease risk in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC)
© Parr et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 03 September 2005
Accepted: 31 January 2006
Published: 31 January 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Sep 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Sep 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shoichiro Tsugane|
|8 Dec 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Christine Louise Parr|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Dec 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Dec 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Christine Louise Parr|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Dec 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Jan 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Christine Louise Parr|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|25 Jan 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|31 Jan 2006||Editorially accepted|
|31 Jan 2006||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-5-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.