Ethnic variation in validity of classification of overweight and obesity using self-reported weight and height in American women and men: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
© Gillum and Sempos; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 19 July 2005
Accepted: 06 October 2005
Published: 06 October 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|19 Jul 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Sep 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Richard Gillum|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Sep 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Sep 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Richard Gillum|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Sep 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|4 Oct 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Richard Gillum|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|4 Oct 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|6 Oct 2005||Editorially accepted|
|6 Oct 2005||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-4-27|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.