Randomized comparison of the effects of the vitamin D3adequate intake versus 100 mcg (4000 IU) per day on biochemical responses and the wellbeing of patients
© Vieth et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 23 March 2004
Accepted: 19 July 2004
Published: 19 July 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|23 Mar 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Mar 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Reinhold Vieth|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Mar 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Jun 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Reinhold Vieth|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Jun 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|13 Jul 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Reinhold Vieth|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|13 Jul 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|19 Jul 2004||Editorially accepted|
|19 Jul 2004||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-3-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.