The potential use of chickpeas in development of infant follow-on formula
© Malunga et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 31 July 2013
Accepted: 8 January 2014
Published: 22 January 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|31 Jul 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Ram Reifen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kebreab Ghebremeskel|
|23 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Li Hui Liu|
|13 Nov 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Ram Reifen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 Nov 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kebreab Ghebremeskel|
|25 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Li Hui Liu|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|3 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Ram Reifen|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|3 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|8 Jan 2014||Editorially accepted|
|22 Jan 2014||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-13-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.