Validity and relative validity of a novel digital approach for 24-h dietary recall in athletes
© Baker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 22 October 2013
Accepted: 21 April 2014
Published: 30 April 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Oct 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stella Volpe|
|13 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Megan McCrory|
|5 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Lindsay Baker|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Megan McCrory|
|2 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Lindsay Baker|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|30 Apr 2014||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-13-41|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.