Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparative absorption of curcumin formulations

  • Ralf Jäger1Email author,
  • Ryan P Lowery2,
  • Allison V Calvanese2,
  • Jordan M Joy2,
  • Martin Purpura1 and
  • Jacob M Wilson2
Nutrition Journal201413:11

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-11

Received: 26 October 2013

Accepted: 20 January 2014

Published: 24 January 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Oct 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jose Antonio
9 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dong Liang
20 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ralf Jäger
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dong Liang
12 Jan 2014 Author responded Author comments - Ralf Jäger
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Jan 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
20 Jan 2014 Editorially accepted
24 Jan 2014 Article published 10.1186/1475-2891-13-11

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Increnovo LLC
(2)
Department of Health Sciences and Human Performance, The University of Tampa

Advertisement