Dietary pattern analysis: a comparison between matched vegetarian and omnivorous subjects
- Peter Clarys1, 2Email author,
- Peter Deriemaeker†1, 2,
- Inge Huybrechts†3,
- Marcel Hebbelinck†1 and
- Patrick Mullie†1, 2, 4
© Clarys et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 14 January 2013
Accepted: 31 May 2013
Published: 13 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Jan 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Clarys|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sharon Kirkpatrick|
|8 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Claus Leitzmann|
|12 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Clarys|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sharon Kirkpatrick|
|30 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Claus Leitzmann|
|22 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Clarys|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 May 2013||Editorially accepted|
|13 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-12-82|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.