Changes in the concentrations of biochemical indicators of diet and nutritional status of pregnant women across pregnancy trimesters in Trujillo, Peru, 2004–2005
© Horton et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 22 May 2012
Accepted: 22 May 2013
Published: 11 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Ian Thurnham|
|31 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emeir McSorley|
|21 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Luke Naeher|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emeir McSorley|
|20 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Ian Thurnham|
|6 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Luke Naeher|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|6 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Ian Thurnham|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|22 May 2013||Editorially accepted|
|11 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-12-80|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.