A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of oral zinc in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy
© Chavez-Tapia et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 29 October 2012
Accepted: 4 June 2013
Published: 6 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - marzia lazzerini|
|5 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Toru Ishikawa|
|12 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eamonn Quigley|
|22 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Norberto Chavez-Tapia|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eamonn Quigley|
|5 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - marzia lazzerini|
|27 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Norberto Chavez-Tapia|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|6 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-12-74|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.