Trends in US home food preparation and consumption: analysis of national nutrition surveys and time use studies from 1965–1966 to 2007–2008
© Smith et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 19 November 2012
Accepted: 4 April 2013
Published: 11 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|19 Nov 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Lindsey Smith|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Wahlqvist|
|14 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Colin Rehm|
|22 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Lindsey Smith|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Colin Rehm|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|4 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|11 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-12-45|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.