Clinician uptake of obesity-related drug information: a qualitative assessment using continuing medical education activities
© Kohlstadt and Wharton; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 2 August 2012
Accepted: 1 April 2013
Published: 10 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Aug 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Ingrid Kohlstadt|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen-leigh Edward|
|22 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Costello|
|26 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Ingrid Kohlstadt|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|4 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Ingrid Kohlstadt|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|4 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|13 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen-leigh Edward|
|19 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Costello|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|1 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|10 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-12-44|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.