The impact of iodine supplementation and bread fortification on urinary iodine concentrations in a mildly iodine deficient population of pregnant women in South Australia
© Clifton et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 6 November 2012
Accepted: 8 March 2013
Published: 15 March 2013
Mild iodine deficiency during pregnancy can have significant effects on fetal development and future cognitive function. The purpose of this study was to characterise the iodine status of South Australian women during pregnancy and relate it to the use of iodine-containing multivitamins. The impact of fortification of bread with iodized salt was also assessed. Women (n = 196) were recruited prospectively at the beginning of pregnancy and urine collected at 12, 18, 30, 36 weeks gestation and 6 months postpartum. The use of a multivitamin supplement was recorded at each visit. Spot urinary iodine concentrations (UIC) were assessed. Median UICs were within the mildly deficient range in women not taking supplements (<90 μg/L). Among the women taking iodine-containing multivitamins UICs were within WHO recommendations (150–249 μg/L) for sufficiency and showed an increasing trend through gestation. The fortification of bread with iodized salt increased the median UIC from 68 μg/L to 84 μg/L (p = .011) which was still in the deficient range. Pregnant women in this region of Australia were unlikely to reach recommended iodine levels without an iodine supplement, even after the mandatory iodine supplementation of bread was instituted in October 2009.
KeywordsIodine Pregnancy Urine Supplements
Iodine deficiency affects nearly 2 billion people globally and is easily preventable with the use of iodized salt in the diet . Iodine deficiency during pregnancy is associated with increased rates of stillbirths, spontaneous abortions, and congenital anomalies  and is the leading worldwide preventable cause of intellectual impairment in children . A global survey of iodine sufficiency in 2011 identified that although there was some improvement worldwide in iodine sufficiency, 29.8% of school aged children still had insufficient iodine intake . The iodine intake of pregnant women in Australia has been found to be inadequate in several studies over the past decade [5–11] but has not been examined in the South Australian population where this current study has been conducted. As a result of the studies that have been conducted in Australia, the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) has recommended that all women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or considering pregnancy, with the exception of women with pre-existing thyroid conditions who should seek advice from their medical practitioner, are to take a daily iodine supplement of 150 micrograms per day .
To increase the iodine intake of the Tasmanian population, which has a well-documented history of endemic iodine deficiency , a trial of voluntary iodine fortification of bread was commenced in 2001. There has been a significant improvement in the iodine status of Tasmanian schoolchildren from mildly iodine-deficient to borderline iodine-sufficient . However, the iodine status of pregnant Tasmanian women showed a non-significant improvement rising from 76 to 81–86 μg/L, still in the mildly deficient range .
The National Iodine Nutrition Study  confirmed the existence of an inadequate iodine intake in the mainland Australian population and mandatory iodine fortification of bread was introduced in October 2009 in all Australian States and Territories. This study assessed the iodine status of pregnant South Australian women throughout gestation in relation to their reported intake of dietary iodine-containing multivitamins and the introduction of mandatory iodine fortification of bread in Australia.
Our aim was to examine iodine status in pregnancy in a new region of Australia examining the effect of the recommendation for routine iodine supplementation.
The study was approved by the Queen Elizabeth and Lyell McEwin Hospitals Human Research Ethics Committee as well as the University of Adelaide Human Research Ethics Committees. Pregnant women (n = 196), aged 17–38 years were recruited at the Lyell McEwin Hospital antenatal clinic between January 2009 and July 2010, during the first trimester of pregnancy and provided written informed consent for participation. This hospital is located in a region of socio-economic disadvantage, as characterised by a relative social economic index for areas (SEIFA) score in the lowest decile for Australia . A urine sample was collected at the clinic visit at 12, 18, 30 and 36 weeks gestation. 126 women (64%) provided at least 3 samples, while 24 women (12%) provided only 1 sample, due to non-attendance at their scheduled antenatal appointments. Removal of these data points does not alter the findings of this study and so the samples were included. At each visit women were asked if they were taking a daily dietary multivitamin during pregnancy and the brand was noted. Dietary iodine-containing multivitamins were used by 47% (n = 92) of women during pregnancy, while 23% (n = 45) of women used no multivitamins and 30% (n = 59) used dietary multivitamins that did not contain iodine. Those women who used no multivitamins or a multivitamin that did not contain iodine during pregnancy were grouped because their UIC were not significantly different. It was predicted that urinary iodine concentration (UIC) would increase by 54 μg/ml with bread consumption and an iodine containing multivitamin contains 75 μg with a recommended dose of 2 tablets per day. Those women with complications such as thyroid disease, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, infection or preterm delivery were excluded from the analysis.
Urinary iodine concentration
Urinary iodine was assayed in duplicate using a previously published method . In brief, spot urinary iodine concentrations were determined by a Sandell-Kolthoff reaction. Substances known to interfere with the sensitive colorimetry of the Sandell-Kolthoff reaction, such as thiocyanate, were removed by an ammonium persulphate digestion. Sensitivity of the assay is 5 μg/L. The inter-assay co-efficient of variations (%CV) at 85 μg/L; 185 μg/L and 320 μg/L were 6%; 5% and 8% respectively.
Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS v 17). Clinical characteristics were compared according to the use of iodine-containing multivitamins using t-tests (normally distributed data) or Mann Whitney U-tests (non-normally distributed data). The non-parametric Friedman’s χ2 test was used to assess the UIC data over gestation, while Mann Whitney U tests were used to compare UIC data according to the use of iodine-containing multivitamins. Chi-square analysis was used to assess the frequency of UIC over 150 μg/L with the use of iodine-containing multivitamins.
Clinical characteristics of the 196 pregnant women included in the study according to their use of iodine-containing multivitamins during pregnancy
No supplements n = 45 (23%)
Non-iodine-containing multivitamins n = 58 (30%)
Iodine-containing multivitamins n = 93 (47%)
Weight (12 weeks) (kg)
BMI (12 weeks)
Parity, med (min-max)
Cigarettes use, n (%)
Urinary iodine concentrations increased significantly as pregnancy progressed when all groups were combined (Friedman’s χ2 = 12.974, p = 0.005). Post hoc comparisons indicated that UIC at 36 weeks (median = 118) was significantly higher than UIC at 12 (median = 73), 18 (median = 68) and 30 weeks gestation (median = 84; p < 0.025 in all instances, Figure 1).
Number of women with UIC ≥ 150 μg/L at each gestational time point according to the consumption of iodine-containing dietary supplements
Iodine containing multivitamin
Total n = 89
Total n = 76
Total n = 81
Total n = 79
Total n = 58
Total n = 62
Total n = 51
Total n = 60
Total n = 21
Total n = 17
The median UIC for pregnant women was 82 μg/L (with minimum-maximum 1–754 μg/L) indicating mild iodine deficiency. The consumption of iodine supplements was associated with a significantly higher UIC over pregnancy (median = 89ug/L, minimum-maximum 1–754 μg/L) than women who did not consume iodine-containing multivitamins (median = 75ug/L, minimum-maximum 1–476 ug/L; p = 0.003 Mann Whitney U test). Overall, there was an improvement in iodine status associated with the mandatory iodine fortification of bread. The median UIC of pregnant women not using an iodine-containing multivitamin during pregnancy was 68 μg/L (range 10–327 μg/L, n = 84 samples) prior to bread fortification, and significantly increased to 84 μg/L (range 83.4–393 μg/L, n = 94 samples) post-intervention (p = 0.01).
This is the first South Australian study to examine iodine sufficiency during pregnancy, encompassing the period where mandatory fortification of bread and cereal with iodized salt was implemented, to simultaneously examine the effect of the recently recommended iodine-containing multivitamins during pregnancy. The data indicates that overall women in the Elizabeth-Playford Region of Adelaide are mildly iodine deficient in the absence of supplementation but iodine-containing multivitamins designed for pregnancy lead to iodine sufficiency as measured by UIC (>150 ug/L). Furthermore the fortification of bread significantly increased UIC but not to a level compatible with iodine sufficiency, suggesting that supplements are still required despite the iodized salt initiative in bread and cereal production. Overall these data suggest that women should consider using an iodine-containing multivitamin during pregnancy to improve their iodine concentrations.
Previous studies conducted in other states of Australia indicate that the national population of pregnant women are mildly iodine deficient. Hamrosi et al  examined median UIC in Victorian women of differing ethnicities and reported that all groups were mildly iodine deficient with only slight variations in median concentrations which may be accounted for by dietary differences. More recently it was reported in the Gippsland region of Victoria that bread fortification with iodised salt failed to improve UIC of pregnant women . Mackerras et al.  reported mild iodine deficiency in Aboriginal populations of the Northern Territory and determined bread fortification was not sufficient for pregnant and non-pregnant individuals of this population. In NSW the median UIC was 85 ug/L in pregnant women [6, 7] and this is comparable to the South Australian data reported in the current study. Charlton et al [5, 6] reported that 35% of pregnant women used iodine-containing multivitamins during pregnancy which significantly increased their UIC and placed them in the sufficient iodine range. In Tasmania the mandatory fortification of bread has improved the UIC but levels remain in the mildly deficient range for pregnant women . These data indicate Australian women are iodine deficient and this deficiency is not resolved in pregnancy by mandatory fortification of bread with iodised salt. A multivitamin containing iodine for pregnancy and lactation appears to be the only way to resolve deficiency at this crucial time in fetal and child development.
Poor maternal iodine status during pregnancy has been shown to be associated with alterations in the neonatal thyroid function. McElduff et al.  identified that in two populations of neonates 5–8% of the neonates had mild thyroid deficiency as indicated by a thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations of greater than 5 mlU/L. More recently Rahman et al  reports that neonatal TSH levels of greater than 5 mlU/L have increased by 5% in the last 5 years. Travers et al  reported that mothers with a UIC of less than 50 ug/L were 2.6 times more likely to have a neonate with mild thyroid deficiency. A Swiss study has shown that neonates and infants are especially susceptible to iodine deficiency if breast fed and not receiving food or formula fortified with iodine . Hence, mild iodine deficiency during pregnancy and in the neonatal period can have significant effects on childhood development and cognitive function.
Previous studies have reported in iodine sufficient populations of Japan and Mexico, that UIC decreased with pregnancy [23, 24] and was further decreased postpartum . Similar gestational decreases of UIC were reported in iodine deficient pregnant population of India . We observed a slight rise in iodine in the group of women taking an iodine-containing multivitamin as gestation progressed and a postpartum decrease in UIC. The range of UIC in the population was highly variable. This may be due to variations in dietary intakes within this population despite similarities in age, weight and location of residence. However, high variability in UIC is seen in all studies making this measure only useful in populations rather than in individual assessment of iodine sufficiency. The discrepancy in these findings does not detract from the evidence that pregnant South Australian women are mildly iodine deficient.
The benefits of iodine sufficiency are well known but poor knowledge of the impact of iodine deficiency by the Australian community, along with a lack of nutritional education and supplementation means that pregnant women and their children remain at risk of iodine deficiency. Our current study identifies that South Australian women from a socially disadvantaged background are mildly deficient and could benefit from supplementation during pregnancy and while breast feeding.
The authors wish to acknowledge funding support from the National Health and Medical Research Council Australian Biomedical (Training) Fellowship (ID 1016379 to NAH) and a National Health and Medical Research Council Senior Fellowship (ID 510703 to VLC). Professor Hetzel was awarded a Pollin Prize for Pediatric Research which also supported this work.
- Zimmermann MB: Iodine deficiency. Endocr Rev. 2009, 30: 376-408. 10.1210/er.2009-0011.View Article
- Hetzel BS: Iodine deficiency disorders (IDD) and their eradication. Lancet. 1983, 2: 1126-1129.View Article
- WHO UaI: Iodine Status worldwide: WHO global database on iodine deficiency. 2004, Geneva: World health Organisation
- Andersson M, Karumbunathan V, Zimmermann MB: Global iodine status in 2011 and trends over the past decade. J Nutr. 2012, 142: 744-750. 10.3945/jn.111.149393.View Article
- Charlton KE, Gemming L, Yeatman H, Ma G: Suboptimal iodine status of Australian pregnant women reflects poor knowledge and practices related to iodine nutrition. Nutrition. 2010, 26: 963-968. 10.1016/j.nut.2009.08.016.View Article
- Charlton KE, Yeatman HR, Houweling F: Poor iodine status and knowledge related to iodine on the eve of mandatory iodine fortification in Australia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2010, 19: 250-255.
- Travers CA, Guttikonda K, Norton CA: Iodine status in pregnant women and their newborns: are our babies at risk of iodine deficiency?. Med J Aust. 2006, 184: 617-620.
- Hamrosi MA, Wallace EM, Riley MD: Iodine status in pregnant women living in Melbourne differs by ethnic group. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2005, 14: 27-31.
- McElduff A, McElduff P, Gunton JE, Hams G, Wiley V, Wilcken BM: Neonatal thyroid-stimulating hormone concentrations in northern Sydney: further indications of mild iodine deficiency?. Med J Aust. 2002, 176: 317-320.
- Li M, Ma G, Boyages SC, Eastman CJ: Re-emergence of iodine deficiency in Australia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2001, 10: 200-203. 10.1046/j.1440-6047.2001.00254.x.View Article
- Gunton JE, Hams G, Fiegert M, McElduff A: Iodine deficiency in ambulatory participants at a Sydney teaching hospital: is Australia truly iodine replete?. Med J Aust. 1999, 171: 467-470.
- Council NHaMR: Iodine supplementation for pregnant and breastfeeding women. 2010, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia
- Gibson H: Surveillance of iodine deficiency disorders in Tasmania 1949-1984. 1995, Hobart: Department of Health Services
- Seal JA, Doyle Z, Burgess JR, Taylor R, Cameron AR: Iodine status of Tasmanians following voluntary fortification of bread with iodine. Med J Aust. 2007, 186: 69-71.
- Burgess JR, Seal JA, Stilwell GM, Reynolds PJ, Taylor ER, Parameswaran V: A case for universal salt iodisation to correct iodine deficiency in pregnancy: another salutary lesson from Tasmania. Med J Aust. 2007, 186: 574-576.
- Li M, Eastman CJ, Waite KV: Are Australian children iodine deficient? Results of the Australian National Iodine Nutrition Study. Med J Aust. 2006, 184: 165-169.
- Statistics ABo: Census of population and housing: Socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA). 2006, Commonwealth of Australia
- Ohashi T, Yamaki M, Pandav CS, Karmarkar MG, Irie M: Simple microplate method for determination of urinary iodine. Clin Chem. 2000, 46: 529-536.
- Rahman A, Savige GS, Deacon NJ, Chesters JE, Panther BC: Urinary iodine deficiency in Gippsland pregnant women: the failure of bread fortification?. Med J Aust. 2011, 194: 240-243.
- Mackerras DE, Singh GR, Eastman CJ: Iodine status of Aboriginal teenagers in the Darwin region before mandatory iodine fortification of bread. Med J Aust. 2011, 194: 126-130.
- Rahman A, Savige GS, Deacon NJ, Francis I, Chesters JE: Increased iodine deficiency in Victoria, Australia: analysis of neonatal thyroid-stimulating hormone data, 2001 to 2006. Med J Aust. 193: 503-505.
- Andersson M, Aeberli I, Wust N: The Swiss iodized salt program provides adequate iodine for school children and pregnant women, but weaning infants not receiving iodine-containing complementary foods as well as their mothers are iodine deficient. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010, 95: 5217-5224. 10.1210/jc.2010-0975.View Article
- Garcia-Solis P, Solis SJ, Garcia-Gaytan AC: Iodine nutrition status in pregnant women in Mexico. Thyroid. 2011, 21: 1367-1371. 10.1089/thy.2011.0197.View Article
- Fuse Y, Ohashi T, Yamaguchi S, Yamaguchi M, Shishiba Y, Irie M: Iodine status of pregnant and postpartum Japanese women: effect of iodine intake on maternal and neonatal thyroid function in an iodine-sufficient area. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011, 96: 3846-3854. 10.1210/jc.2011-2180.View Article
- Menon KC, Skeaff SA, Thomson CD: The effect of maternal iodine status on infant outcomes in an iodine-deficient Indian population. Thyroid. 2011, 21: 1373-1380. 10.1089/thy.2011.0130.View Article
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.