Antioxidant supplementation for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
© Gu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 4 September 2012
Accepted: 25 January 2013
Published: 11 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lorenzo Fuccio|
|6 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alejandro González-Ojeda|
|11 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dungeng Peng|
|14 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jason Castellanos|
|1 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Rui-Xing Yin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alejandro González-Ojeda|
|10 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dungeng Peng|
|15 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Rui-Xing Yin|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|15 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|11 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-12-23|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.