Food venue choice, consumer food environment, but not food venue availability within daily travel patterns are associated with dietary intake among adults, Lexington Kentucky 2011
© Gustafson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 19 September 2012
Accepted: 25 January 2013
Published: 29 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|19 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joseph Sharkey|
|24 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Angela Liese|
|2 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shannon Zenk|
|3 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Alison Gustafson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joseph Sharkey|
|22 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Angela Liese|
|7 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Alison Gustafson|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|29 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-12-17|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.