Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Dietary iron does not impact the quality of life of patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis: an observational study

  • Zoe Tolkien1,
  • Dora IA Pereira1,
  • Laura Prassmayer1,
  • Emily Fitt1,
  • Gerda Pot1, 2,
  • Simon M Greenfield3 and
  • Jonathan J Powell1Email author
Contributed equally
Nutrition Journal201312:152

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-152

Received: 11 September 2013

Accepted: 22 November 2013

Published: 23 November 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
11 Sep 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Dora Pereira
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Javier Gisbert
10 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fernando Gomollón García
13 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Dora Pereira
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Nov 2013 Editorially accepted
23 Nov 2013 Article published 10.1186/1475-2891-12-152

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

MRC Human Nutrition Research, Elsie Widdowson Laboratory
Diabetes & Nutritional Sciences Division, School of Medicine, King’s College London
Gastroenterology Department, QE2 Hospital