Review of the safety and efficacy of vitamin A supplementation in the treatment of children with severe acute malnutrition

  • Lora L Iannotti1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Indi Trehan1, 2, 3 and

      Affiliated with

      • Mark J Manary1, 2, 4, 5

        Affiliated with

        Nutrition Journal201312:125

        DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-125

        Received: 6 March 2013

        Accepted: 21 August 2013

        Published: 12 September 2013

        Abstract

        Background

        World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommend for children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM), high-dose vitamin A (VA) supplements be given on day 1 of admission, and on days 2 and 14 in the case of clinical signs of vitamin A deficiency (VAD). Daily low-dose VA follows, delivered in a premix added to F-75 and F-100. This study aimed to systematically review the evidence for safety and effectiveness of high-dose VA supplementation (VAS) in treatment of children with SAM.

        Methods

        A comprehensive literature review was undertaken for all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies from 1950 to 2012. Studies identified for full review were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology using a set of pre-defined criteria: indirectness; inconsistency; imprecision; and study limitations. A quality rating of high, moderate, or low was then assigned to each study, and only those attaining moderate to high were considered in making recommendations.

        Results

        Of the 2072 abstracts screened, 38 met criteria for full review, and 20 were rated moderate to high quality. Only one study replicated the WHO VA protocol in children with SAM. Indirectness was a critical limitation, as studies were not exclusive to children with SAM. There was inconsistency across trials for definitions of malnutrition, morbidities, and ages studied; and imprecision arising from sub-group analyses and small sample sizes. Evidence showed improved outcomes associated with low-dose compared to high-dose VAS, except in cases presenting with signs of VAD, measles, and severe diarrhea or shigellosis. Adverse outcomes related to respiratory infection, diarrhea, and growth were associated with high-dose VAS in children who were predominantly adequately nourished. No adverse effects of the high dose were found in children with SAM in the trial that replicated the WHO VA guideline.

        Conclusion

        This is the first systematic review of the safety and efficacy of high-dose VAS in treatment of SAM. We recommend a low-dose VAS regimen for children with SAM, except in cases presenting with measles, severe diarrhea (shigellosis), and any indication of VAD. Further research is needed in exclusively malnourished children and to explore alternate delivery strategies.

        Keywords

        GRADE Vitamin A supplementation Severe acute malnutrition Systematic review

        Background

        Globally, vitamin A deficiency (VAD) affects 100–140 million children, 4.4 million of whom have xerophthalmia [1, 2]. Coverage rates for full vitamin A supplementation (VAS) of children 6–59 months delivered through primary care have risen significantly over the last decade, reaching 88% for the least developed countries [3]. In recent years, alternative strategies to improve micronutrient nutrition have been increasingly applied for high-risk populations already supplemented with vitamin A (VA): micronutrient powders; fortification of staple foods; ready-to-use supplemental and therapeutic foods (RUSF and RUTF); and other food-based approaches.

        Among the populations particularly vulnerable to VAD are children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) [4]. The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends that for inpatient care of children with SAM, VA supplements be given on day 1 of admission unless there is clear evidence that VA was received in the last month [5]. Dosing guidelines are the following: 200,000 international units (IU) for children over 12 months of age, 100,000 IU for children 6–12 months, and 50,000 IU for children below 6 months. If clinical signs of vitamin A deficiency are present, then another age-specific, large dose is administered on day 2 and again, on day 14 [4, 5]. Low-dose VA is then given as part of a vitamin mix added to F-75 or F-100 therapeutic milk formulations, or alternatively, as a proprietary multivitamin supplement or combined mineral-vitamin mix (CMV). There is a need to revisit these guidelines in the context of improved VA availability, but also in view of evidence showing the potential for harmful effects of such VAS dosages [6].

        Methods

        This systematic review aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of VAS in children with SAM, with regards to mortality, nutritional recovery, and signs of symptomatic VAD [7]. A literature review was undertaken to search for all randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies published from 1950 to March 2012. Databases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. The clinical trial registries at clinicaltrials.gov, pactr.org, and apps.who.int/trialsearch were also searched. Initial key words for the searches included “malnutrition”, “severe malnutrition”, “kwashiorkor”, “marasmus”, “vitamin A”, and “retinol”. A number of outcome measures were sought, including mortality, weight gain, nutritional recovery, and VAD. Further terms were added iteratively to the search based on results obtained from the initial searches.

        Searches were also conducted to identify relevant publications and study documents produced by international health organizations such as the WHO and UNICEF. The titles and abstracts were scanned to identify relevant studies. The full text of relevant studies was obtained and the list of articles for inclusion further optimized based on an evaluation of the full text. Reference lists in relevant articles were also scanned manually and electronically to identify other studies that may have been missed in the original searches. Relevant publications that cited those previously identified articles were similarly sought.

        Studies were included for full review based on relevance to the population of interest, study interventions, study design, outcome measures, and an assessment of the study’s methodological rigor and quality. These studies were then assessed and entered into a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) table summarizing design, aim, outcomes, GRADE criteria assessment (indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision, and study limitations), and quality ranking (high, moderate, or low) [8].

        Indirectness was judged based on study relevance to the review question in terms of the study population (children with SAM), intervention of interest (VAS), and outcome measures (mortality, recovery from SAM, signs of symptomatic VAD, and adverse outcomes due to supplementation) [9]. Consideration was given under this category to VA dosing relative the WHO protocol. Inconsistency was assessed by comparing point estimates and examining the heterogeneity of methods and statistical analyses [10]. Imprecision was based primarily on the 95% confidence interval with consideration of effect and sample sizes [11]. Potential biases (selection, recall, information/observation, misclassification) arising from failure to blind, losses in follow-up, inappropriate controls, and failure to adjust for confounding factors, among other problems, were considered under the study limitations (risk of bias) criteria [12].

        Once these criteria were assessed, each study was assigned a quality ranking ranging from low to high. Only those studies with some degree of moderate or high (i.e., low-moderate, moderate, moderate-high, or high) quality ranking were included in this review for consideration in making recommendations on the use of VAS for the treatment of children with SAM.

        Results

        Of the 2072 abstracts identified and screened, 38 were selected for full review (Figure 1). Twenty-two were of moderate- to high-quality, and were grouped into 3 categories and listed primary outcomes assessed: 1) previous reviews; 2) observational studies; and 3) randomized controlled trials (RCT).
        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2891-12-125/MediaObjects/12937_2013_711_Fig1_HTML.jpg
        Figure 1

        Flow diagram for studies included in review. The figure presents a flow diagram detailing the number of records screened and excluded, full-text articles reviewed, and ultimately, the number of studies included in the systematic review. The included observational and RCT studies are enumerated according to the primary outcome examined.

        Previous reviews

        Two previous reviews of VAS trials were identified; both considered malnourished children together with those not malnourished [7, 13]. Preventive VAS reduced all-cause mortality by 25% and diarrhea-specific mortality by 30%. VA showed greater protection against morbidity and mortality in Asia than in Africa or Latin America [13]. An earlier review found that the severity of measles and diarrheal infections were reduced by VAS, but the risk of lower respiratory tract infection was increased in some trials [7]. Because the reviews did not provide new evidence for VA and management of SAM and all studies from the reviews were screened for this review, they were not included in the GRADE assessment.

        Observational studies

        Five observational studies were identified and assigned a GRADE quality ranking of low to moderate [1418] (Additional file 1: Table S1). These studies found significant associations between serum or plasma retinol concentrations and SAM [1416]. Others established a link between VAD, SAM, and diarrhea. In Bangladesh, reduced serum retinol concentrations were associated with shigellosis and low weight-for-age Z-score [18]. Another case–control study in Bangladesh showed that the duration of diarrhea and SAM were independently associated with xerophthalmia [17].

        Randomized controlled trials

        Fifteen RCTs of moderate to high quality based on GRADE criteria were included in the systematic review on the safety and efficacy of high-dose VAS in children with SAM (Table 1). Issues of indirectness were present in all trials. Only one trial included children with SAM exclusively [19]. The remaining 14 included non-malnourished and malnourished children [2033]. VA dosing also varied; only five trials administered the recommended high-dose on day 1 [19, 26, 30, 31, 33], while the remaining administered VA doses in varying quantities and forms. Only one trial followed the WHO protocol [19]; two compared high dose with daily low dose [26, 33], and the remaining 12 compared high dose VAS with placebo [2025, 2732].
        Table 1

        Randomized controlled trials included in the systematic review

        Quality Assessment

        Summary of Findings

        GRADE Rating

         

        Treatment Groups (sample size)

        Effect

         

        Ref

        Design

        Indirectness

        Inconsistency

        Imprecision

        Study Limitations (risk of bias)

        Intervention Cases

        Control Comparison

        Relative Risk (95% CI)

        Absolute

         

        Sattar, 2012 [19]

        RCT, double-blind

        Pop: children 6-59 mo with SAM and diarrhea and/or ALRI

        SAM def: WHZ < -3 or bipedal edema

        No serious imprecision

        No differences in baseline characteristics

        High-dose and daily low-dose VA (n = 130)

        Daily low-dose VA (n = 130)

          

        MOD-HIGH

         

        Aim: test the efficacy and safety of WHO protocol for VAS in treatment of SAM among children 6-59 mo

        VA dose: day 1: high-dose group, 200,000 IU (> 12 mo) or 100,000 IU (< 12 mo); low-dose group, placebo; day 2-15, 5000 IU daily for 15 days (both groups)

          

        External validity: all children had diarrhea and low mean baseline serum retinol 13.15 ± 9.28 ug/dl

        Resolution by 48 hr of acute diarrhea, dysentery, and ALRI

          

        NS

         
          

        Secondary outcome examined and found no increased risk of adverse events VA toxicity and morbidities.

           

        Duration of acute diarrhea, invasive diarrhea, cough, fever, rales, edema, and skin changes

          

        NS

         
              

        Changes in nutritional status, weight, length, MUAC, head circumference

          

        NS

         
              

        Incidence of nosocomial diarrhea

         

        aOR 1.25 (0.67, 2.34)

        NS

         
              

        and ALRI infections

         

        aOR 0.63 (0.36-1.09)

        NS

         

        Donnen, 2007 [33]

        RCT, double-blind

        Pop: 44-48% WHZ < -2; 30-37% MUAC < 125 mm

        SAM def: WHZ < -2; MUAC < 125 mm

        No serious imprecision

        Age confounding: high-dose group younger

        Daily low-dose VA (n = 610)

        Single high-dose VA and placebo daily (n = 604)

          

        MOD

         

        Aim: assess effect of single high-dose vs. daily low-dose VA supplements on hospitalized malnourished Senegalese children’s (0 - 14 yr) morbidity

        VA dose: high-dose: single 200,000 IU (> 12 mo) or 100,000 IU (< 12 mo); low-dose: 5000 IU daily until discharge

          

        Baseline nutrition: MUAC lower in high-dose group

        Incidence of respiratory disease

         

        HR 0.26 (0.07 - 0.92)

        p < 0.05

         
          

        Sub-group: children with edema mortality lower in low-dose (AOR 0.21, 0.05-0.99)

           

        Duration: respiratory disease

         

        HR of cure 1.41 (1.05 - 1.89)

        p = 0.019

         
              

        Incidence & duration of diarrhea

         

        HR 1.02 (0.68 - 1.52)

        NS

         

        Mahalan-abis, 2004 [32]

        RCT, factorial

        Pop: children with marasmus or edema excluded

        No serious inconsistency

        Small sample

        Baseline nutrition: serum retinol was 0.387 μmol/L higher (P = 0.001) in VA treated group

        zinc + VA (n = 38) zinc (n = 39) VA (n = 38)

        Placebo (n = 38)

          

        LOW-MOD

         

        Aim: evaluate effect of zinc and VA on clinical recovery of Indian children (2 - 24 mo) with severe acute lower respiratory infections

        VA dose: 10,000 μg RE 2x/d for 4d; zinc 10 mg 2x/d for 5d

           

        Recovery rates from very ill status zinc (boys)

         

        2.63 (1.35 - 5.10)

          
              

        Recovery rate from fever zinc

         

        3.12 (1.47 - 6.6)

        NS

         
              

        Recovery rates for VA

            
              

        Adverse event risk increased risk of diarrhea in VA group

          

        p = 0.028

         
              

        increased risk of any adverse events in VA group

         

        RR 3.8 (1.32-10.93)

          

        Fawzi, 2000 [31]

        RCT

        VA dose: given on days 0 and 2, and again at 4 and 8 mo; dose after discharge, 200,000 IU (> 1 yr) or 100,000 IU (infants)

        SAM def: NCHS references; WHZ < -2

        Statistics: few variables studied in multivariate analyses

        Potential seasonal bias: enrollment during 1993-1997

        VA (n = 289)

        Placebo (n = 285)

          

        LOW-MOD

         

        Aim: determine effect of VAS on risk of diarrhea and acute respiratory infections in hospitalized Tanzanian children (6 - 60 mo)

        Sub-group: adverse event risk normally nourished children: VA increased risk of acute diarrhea; wasted children protective against diarrhea

        Diarrhea def: mother’s perception; 3+ days elapsed between episode; persistent diarrhea defined as lasting 14+ days

          

        Severe watery diarrhea

         

        AOR 0.56 (0.32 - 0.99)

          
              

        Hospitalization

          

        NS

         
              

        Adverse event risk cough and rapid respiratory rate

         

        AOR 1.67 (1.17 - 2.36)

          

        Faruque, 1999 [29]

        RCT, factorial

        Pop: 34-35% WAZ < -2; acute diarrhea ≤ 3 days

        Diarrhea def: mother’s perception with picture

        No serious imprecision

        No differences observed by stunting at baseline

        Group A: VA 15d (n = 170) Group B: zinc (n = 172) Group C: VA + zinc (n = 171)

        Placebo (n = 171)

          

        MOD

         

        Aim: to assess efficacy of zinc or VAS in Bangladeshi children (6 mo - 2 yr) with acute diarrhea

        VA dose: 4500 μg RE for 15d

        Children observed in hospital 24 h and followed at home 15d

          

        Zinc groups Diarrhea duration reduced by 13 %

          

        p = 0.03

         
          

        Zinc dose: 14.2 - 40 mg zinc for 15d

           

        Prolonged diarrhea reduced by 43%

          

        p = 0.017

         
              

        VA groups Prolonged diarrhea

          

        NS

         
              

        Overall diarrhea duration

          

        NS

         

        Donnen, AJCN 1998 [26]

        RCT, double-blind

        Pop: 26-28% WHZ < -2; 20-29% MUAC < 125 mm

        SAM def: WHZ < -2, MUAC < 125 mm

        Small effect size

        Baseline CRP elevated in high dose group

        Daily low-dose VA (n = 298)

        High-dose VA (n = 300)

          

        MOD

         

        Aim: assess effect of single high-dose vs. daily low-dose VA supplements on hospitalized pre-school aged children in Democratic Republic of Congo

        VA dose: high-dose: single 200,000 IU (> 12 mo) or 100,000 IU (< 12 mo) at admission; low-dose: 5000 IU daily until discharge

           

        Sub-group: SAM (low dose VA vs. placebo) Incidence of severe diarrhea in SAM

        Placebo (n = 302)

        RR 0.21(0.07 - 0.62)

          
          

        Adverse event risk Sub-group: children with no edema increased risk of diarrhea with high-dose VA compared to placebo (AOR 2.42, 1.15 - 5.11)

           

        Duration of: severe diarrhea

          

        NS

         
              

        Acute lower respiratory infection

          

        NS

         
              

        Fever

          

        NS

         

        Donnen, J of Nutr. 1998 [20]

        RCT

        VA dose: 60 mg oily solution of retinyl palmitate (30 mg for children < 12 mo)

        SAM def: WHZ < -2, MUAC < 125 mm; NCHS standards; discharged children

         

        Failure to blind: no placebo used

        Group 1: VA baseline and at 6 mo (n = 118)

        Group 3: placebo (n = 117)

          

        MOD

         

        Aim: assess effect of single high-dose VA supplements and regular antiparasitic therapy on growth of moderately malnourished children (0 - 72 mo) from eastern Zaire

        Pop: 4-9% WHZ < -2

          

        Unclear why changes in Z-scores not compared

        Group 2: Mebendazole every 3 mo for 1 yr (n = 123)

            
          

        Sub-group: VA boys gain more weight and height

           

        Group 1: Annual weight gain 2.09 kg

        Group 3: Annual weight gain 1.18 kg

         

        p = 0.029

         
              

        MUAC gain 2.24 cm

        MUAC gain 0.95 cm

         

        p = 0.012

         
              

        Group 2 vs. 3 Growth

          

        NS

         
              

        Adverse risk: VA girls gained less height than controls. De-wormed boys and girls gained less weight than control boys and girls

            

        Stephen-sen, 1998 [28]

        RCT, double-blinded

        VA dose: children ≤ 1 yr: 100,000 IU on day 1 and 50,000 IU on day 2; children > 1 yr: 200,000 IU on day 1 and 100,000 IU on day 2

        SAM def: US reference population

        Small sample

        Potential confounding: WHZ lower in VA group at baseline

        VA (n = 48)

        Placebo (n = 49)

          

        LOW-MOD

         

        Aim: test hypothesis that high-dose VA supplements will enhance recovery of Peruvian children (3 mo - 10 yrs) hospitalized with pneumonia

          

        Statistics: univariate comparisons reported primarily without adjusting for covariates

        Selective reporting

        Adverse events: ↓ blood oxygen saturation

        Adverse events: ↑blood oxygen saturation

         

        p < 0.05

         
              

        Prevalence of retractions 37%

        Prevalence of retractions 15%

           
              

        Auscultatory evidence of consolidation 28%

        Auscultatory evidence of consolidation 17%

           
              

        supplemental oxygen need 21%

        supplemental oxygen need 8%

           
              

        Duration of hospitalization

          

        NS

         
              

        Chest x-rays

          

        NS

         

        Nacul, 1997 [24]

        RCT, double-blind placebo

        VA dose: 200,000 IU (< 12 mo); 400 000 IU (> 12 mo)

        Pop: some hospitalized while others outpatient

        No serious imprecision

        Low serum retinol at baseline in both groups likely due to infection; serum retinol in VA group higher on day 11

        VA (n = 239)

        Placebo (n = 233)

          

        MOD-HIGH

         

        Aim: evaluate impact of VAS on clinical recovery and severity of pneumonia among Brazilian children (6 - 59 mo)

        Subgroup analysis showed beneficial effect on those most severely affected with VA deficiency

           

        Fever by day 3: 16 %

        Fever by day 3: 26.4 %

         

        p = 0.008

         
             

        Transitory bulging fontanelle (4%)

        Failure to respond to first line antibiotic

         

        rate ratio 0.71 (0.50 - 1.01)

        p = 0.054

         
             

        No effect attributable to etiological agent

        Duration of pneumonia

          

        NS

         
              

        Incidence of adverse outcomes

          

        NS

         

        Julien, 1999 [30]

        RCT, double-blind placebo

        VA dose: 200,000 IU (>12 mo); 100,000 IU (< 12 mo)

         

        Small sample size to detect morbidity differences

        VA deficiency high at baseline in both groups: 68.9% had serum retinol <10 μg/dL and 93.2% serum retinol < 20 μg/dL

        VA (n = 71)

        Placebo (n = 93)

          

        LOW-MOD

         

        Aim: test the potential of VAS at admission to speed up recovery during hospitalization for lower respiratory infection and decrease morbidities at 6 wk in Mozambican children (6 - 72 mo)

        Pop: kwashiorkor and marasmus excluded

           

        Rate of clinical discharge on day 5: 88.4%

        Rate of clinical discharge on day 5: 73.9%

        RR 1.9 (1.01 - 3.05)

        NS

         
             

        No adjustment with covariates

        6 wk Health care use Illness (fever, cough, or diarrhea)

          

        NS

         

        Hossain, 1998 [27]

        RCT, double-blind

        Pop: excluded if WAZ ≤75% NCHS

        Diarrhea def: liquid stools that can be poured or contain blood or mucus; clinical cure: ≤3 formed stools without visible blood or mucus

        Small sample size

        Baseline VA status not determined, but population prevalence high

        VA (n = 42)

        Control (n = 41)

          

        LOW-MOD

         

        Aim: evaluate efficacy of single oral dose VA in treating shigellosis among Bangladeshi children (1 - 7 yr)

           

        No adjustment with covariates

        Clinical cure 19/24 (45%)

        Clinical cure 8/14 (20%)

        risk ratio 0.68 (0.50 - 0.93)

        p = 0.02

         
               

        Bacteriological cure 16/42 (38%)

           
          

        Bacteriological cure 16/41 (39%)

        risk ratio 0.98 (0.70 - 1.39)

        NS

              

        Si, 1997 [25]

        RCT, double-blind

        Pop: SAM excluded; 45% moderately underweight

        Nutrition def: moderate malnutrition defined as WAZ 60-80% of NCHS median

        No confidence intervals provided

        Potential selection bias: trend for greater pneumonia severity in VA group (p = 0.06)

        VA (n = 280)

        Placebo (n = 312)

         

        NS

        LOW-MOD

         

        Aim: evaluate effect of high dose VA supplement on morbidity in hospitalized Vietnamese children (1 - 59 mo) with pneumonia

        VA dose: 200,000 in peanut oil (< 1 yr); 400,000 IU in peanut oil (1 - 4 yr)

          

        No baseline VA status

        Mean time to normal: fever respiratory rate

          

        NS

         
          

        Sub-group analysis: moderately malnourished girls showed shorter duration of hospitalization

          

        No adjustment for covariates

        Duration of hospitalization

          

        NS

         

        Dibley, 1995 [23]

        RCT, double-blind

        Pop: 3.4% wasted; 37% stunted

        Morbidity def: 3+ loose stools per day; time between episodes 2+ diarrhea-free days

        Small effect size for acute respiratory infection; large CI for acute lower respiratory infection

        Baseline difference in immunization status: ever vaccinated for polio and measles higher in VA group

        VA (n = 396)

        Placebo (n = 386)

          

        MOD-HIGH

         

        Aim: test efficacy of high-dose VA supplement on acute respiratory and diarrheal illnesses in Indonesian children (6 - 47 mo)

        VA dose: 103,000 IU (< 1 yr); 206,000 IU (≥ 1 yr)

        Acute respiratory episode with 2+ adjoining days for cough; time between episodes of 3+ symptom-free days

          

        Adverse event risks Acute respiratory infection

         

        rate ratio 1.08 (1.01 - 1.19)

          
          

        Adverse event risk: Subgroup analysis showed VA increased diarrhea incidence in children < 30 mo

           

        Acute lower respiratory infection

         

        rate ratio 1.39 (1.00 - 1.93)

          
              

        Diarrhea

          

        NS

         

        Coutsou-dis, 1991 [22]

        RCT, double blind

        VA dose: 54.5 mg (< 12 mo); 109 mg (>12 mo)

        Nut def: WAZ by NCHS

        Small sample size

        Losses to follow-up were 20% at 6 weeks and 40% at 6 months; no characteristics of this group provided

        VA (n = 24)

        Placebo (n = 24)

          

        MOD

         

        Aim: test efficacy of VAS on measles morbidity in South African children (4 - 24 mo)

         

        Morbidity def: diarrhea: 3+ loose or watery stools per day; pneumonia: presence of tachypnea with retractions, crackles, wheezes

        Statistics: β set to 0.5 only to detect 30% increase in absolute recovery

        No adjustment for covariates; only univariate analyses

        IMS score 0.24 ± 0.15

        IMS score 1.37 ± 0.40

         

        p = 0.037

         
           

        Integrated morbidity score (IMS) used

          

        Weight gain at 6 wk 1.29 ± 0.17 kg

        Weight gain at 6 wk 0.90 ± 0.14 kg

         

        P = 0.04

         
              

        Pneumonia recovery 3.8 ± 0.40 d

        Pneumonia recovery 5.7 ± 0.79 d

         

        P < 0.05

         

        Hussey, 1990 [21]

        RCT, double-blind

        Pop: 70/189 (37%) with WHZ < 5th%

        Nutrition def: percentiles of NCHS standards

        Rare events: mortality; pneumonia / diarrhea duration ≥10 days

        Differences in baseline characteristics except rash duration and lower levels of total protein and albumin in placebo

        VA (n = 92)

        Placebo (n = 97)

          

        MOD-HIGH

         

        Aim: test efficacy of high dose VAS on measles complications among hospitalized South African children

        VA dose: 400,000 IU at admission

          

        High prevalence of “hyporetinemia” (< 7.0 μmol /L) 76%

        Pneumonia recovery 6.3 d

        Pneumonia recovery 12.4 d

         

        P < 0.001

         
             

        No adjustment for covariates

        Diarrhea recovery 5.6 d

        Diarrhea recovery 8.5 d

         

        P < 0.001

         
              

        Croup 13 cases

        Croup 27 cases

        0.51 (0.28 - 0.92)

        P = 0.01

         
              

        Days in hospital 10.6 d

        Days in hospital 14.8 d

        0.21 (0.05 - 0.94)

          
              

        Mortality 2 deaths

        Mortality 10 deaths

           
              

        Risk of death due to major complication

         

        RR 0.51 (0.35, 0.74)

          

        The table presents the included RCT studies in the review by date of publication, from most recent to oldest. For each study, the design, aim, quality assessment by GRADE criteria, findings, and GRADE rating are provided.

        Inconsistency across trials was observed with regards to the ages of children studied, ranging from birth to 14 years. Definitions of morbidity and malnutrition varied, as well as use of differing growth references and standards. Small sample sizes and rare events were the most common problems related to imprecision. Despite randomization, several studies also showed significant differences in baseline characteristics that elevated the risk of bias. Notably, these included baseline age and nutritional status differences with higher likelihoods of confounding [28, 32, 33].

        Some key findings were identified across trials. First, low-dose VAS conferred more or similar health and recovery advantages when compared to high-dose supplementation in the treatment of malnourished children [19, 26, 33]. Second, high-dose VAS showed mixed results relative to placebo for infectious disease outcomes in children with and without SAM, showing benefit in some trials for children with severe diarrhea or shigellosis [27, 31], measles [21, 22], other acute respiratory infections [30], and undifferentiated fever [24]. However, in other trials, there was no benefit for children with acute respiratory infections or diarrhea [2426, 29, 32]. There was also some evidence of improved growth outcomes associated with high-dose VAS among VA deficient children [20] and children with measles [22].

        Finally, adverse effects were found to be associated with high-dose VAS in some trials, including an increased rate of respiratory illnesses [23, 28] and diarrhea [26, 31]. These findings appear primarily in samples or sub-samples of adequately nourished children. As noted previously, we identified only one RCT that included only severely malnourished children [19]. Some explicitly excluded children with marasmus, kwashiorkor, or all children with SAM [25, 27, 30, 32], while the remaining included both malnourished and adequately nourished children. Among the five studies finding adverse events in association with VAS, two of these studies carried out sub-group analyses showing an increased risk of diarrhea among normally nourished children [31] and among children without edema [26]. One trial included only adequately nourished children [28], another found increased risk of ALRI in mainly adequately nourished children [23], and one included both malnourished and adequately nourished children, excluding children with SAM [32]. No adverse effects of the high-dose VAS were found in children with SAM in the trial that replicated the WHO VA guidelines [19].

        Discussion

        Our systematic review of the literature using the GRADE methodology revealed only limited evidence that directly addresses the safety and effectiveness of high-dose VAS for children with SAM. Fourteen of the 15 RCTs identified for this review included both malnourished and non-malnourished children, thereby complicating the extrapolation of findings directly to efficacy and safety of VAS for SAM. There is sufficient evidence to recommend the use of high-dose VAS for children with SAM when presenting with measles, severe diarrhea (shigellosis), or evidence of VAD. The low-dose VAS regimen should be considered as the preferred protocol in other cases of malnourished children, given the potential for adverse events and similar recovery outcomes when compared to high-dose VAS. Higher quality prospective studies are still needed to directly examine VAD in children with SAM, applying more contemporary definitions of morbidity and malnutrition, and powered sufficiently to detect the critical outcomes of interest.

        Observational studies demonstrated an association between SAM and VAD, but metabolic disruptions in SAM might preclude accurate measures of true VA status. Blood biomarkers of retinol concentrations were primarily used to indicate VA status [1416, 18]. Protein-energy malnutrition has been associated with reduced hepatic synthesis of retinol binding protein (RBP) and transthyretin used to transport VA in the body [34, 35]. Thus, VA stores in the liver may not be mobilized appropriately in malnourished children and therefore not be reflected in blood biomarkers. Mitra showed that VA status improved from baseline to hospital discharge, even without VAS [18]. That study also showed that while urinary losses of retinol were associated with low retinol concentrations in children with dysentery, other inflammatory markers such as body temperature and serum α-1-acid glycoprotein and C reactive protein concentrations were more highly and negatively correlated with vitamin A status.

        There is some evidence that diarrhea could be mediating this relationship, as revealed by independent associations between diarrhea, low WAZ, and VA levels [17]. Shigellosis, in particular, increases the risk of VAD [18]. A study in Brazil showed a possible interaction between SAM and low serum retinol concentrations for higher diarrheal morbidities [15]. Evidence from RCTs also finds that high-dose VAS may be beneficial for treating severely malnourished children in cases of severe diarrhea [27, 31]. Again, the mechanism by which VA may be operating to mitigate severe diarrhea in SAM has not been elucidated, but it may be either through the repair of the gut epithelium or immune pathways that restore balance between T-cell subsets [36].

        Two studies showed unequivocally the benefit of lose-dose (5000 IU daily until discharge) compared to a single high-dose (200,000 IU for children over 12 months or 100,000 IU for children under 12 months on day 1 of hospitalization) VAS regimen [26, 33]. The low-dose regimen was more strongly correlated with lower incidence and shorter duration of respiratory disease [33] and a lower incidence of severe diarrhea [26]. A third study in Bangladesh also examined the administration of a lose-dose protocol in relation to a high-dose on day 1 followed by daily low doses until hospital discharge. [19]. That study did not find any differences in the two groups on a range of morbidity and nutrition recovery outcomes and adverse events. All children at baseline had diarrhea and while clinical signs of VAD were not apparent, baseline measures of VA status did indicate VAD in the sample. With regards to other morbidities, high-dose VAS was effective in reducing measles-specific respiratory illness [21, 22], but showed mixed results with regards to non-measles pneumonia and other acute lower respiratory tract infections in children with SAM [2325, 2830, 32, 37, 38].

        Only one trial identified in this review specifically included children who were HIV + [31]. Sub-group analyses stratified by HIV status showed a trend towards a protective effect of high-dose VAS on cough and rapid respiratory rate for HIV-infected children [RR 0.54 (0.24-1.20), p = 0.07], while children without HIV infection were at increased risk for these conditions [RR 1.47 (1.16-1.86), p = 0.001]. Because children infected with HIV are highly vulnerable to SAM and VAD, more research is needed to understand the optimal protocols for this population [39].

        The evidence for growth outcomes in the follow-up period from hospital discharge was limited and somewhat dated [20, 22]. One study showed that only among children who were VA deficient at baseline were there greater improvements in weight and MUAC in those who received high-dose VAS; this was not evident in the non-VA deficient children and high-dose VAS even reduced height gain among non-VA deficient girls [20]. Standard therapeutic foods designed for growth recovery in SAM may be a safer source of VA in certain cases. The foods contain VA as retinyl acetate, similar to VA supplements, in the following concentrations (per 100 g): F-75, 900 μg; F-100, 800 μg; and RUTF, 800–1100 μg. Thus, for a child weighing 5 kg, this would translate into 1,119 μg/d VA for F-75, or 1,544 μg/d VA for F-100, and 1,680 μg/d VA for RUTF. These quantities are comparable to the low-dose regimen of 5000 IU or 1500 μg retinol and are well below the high-dose recommendation of 100,000 IU or 30,000 μg/d VA that would be given to children under 12 mo. While these foods have not specifically been assessed as alternatives to VAS, the safety and efficacy of these products in the treatment of SAM is well-accepted [4042]. Particularly in cases when a child’s VA status is unknown or adequate, therapeutic foods could thus serve as the delivery mechanism for low-dose VAS, though more research is needed.

        Adverse effects found to be associated with high-dose VAS warrant more research. The most frequent negative outcome was an increased risk of acute respiratory infections [23, 28, 31, 33]. There was also evidence of an increased risk of acute, non-severe diarrhea, mediated in part by nutritional status [26, 31, 32]. It should be noted that the adverse effects arising from high-dose VAS were found in samples or sub-samples that included primarily adequately nourished children. Heterogeneity in baseline characteristics and study design complicates comparisons across the various studies, but these safety issues should not be ignored. Excessive intake of preformed VA, notably in the absence of dietary fatty acids, may overwhelm the esterification process and introduce more harmful forms of VA into the child’s circulation [6]. Further along the metabolic pathway, VA presented to cell membranes in forms other than the RBP complex (as may be the case in SAM) can also lead to significant cellular damage [43]. Carotenoid forms of VA or lipid-based nutrient supplements such as RUTF, should be explored to minimize oxidative stress while still addressing VAD [44].

        Conclusions

        In the treatment of children with SAM, a high-dose VAS protocol can be safely recommended in cases presenting with measles, severe diarrhea (shigellosis), or symptoms of VAD. More research is needed to study this specific question in populations exclusively malnourished and to understand and prevent adverse outcomes related to high-dose VAS. We recommend exploration of alternative low-dose protocols and strategies beyond VAS, such as use of carotenoids or RUTF interventions, to address VA deficiency and associated health outcomes in the treatment of children with SAM.

        Abbreviations

        ALRI: 

        Acute lower respiratory infection

        GRADE: 

        Grading of recommendations assessment development and evaluation

        MUAC: 

        Mid-upper arm circumference

        RCT: 

        Randomized controlled trial

        RUTF: 

        Ready-to-use therapeutic food

        SAM: 

        Severe acute malnutrition

        VA: 

        Vitamin A

        VAD: 

        Vitamin A deficiency

        VAS: 

        Vitamin A supplementation

        WAZ: 

        Weight-for-age Z score

        WHZ: 

        Weight-for-height Z score.

        Declarations

        Acknowledgements

        Funding was provided by the World Health Organization (WHO) to support the work of M. Manary and L. Iannotti.

        Authors’ Affiliations

        (1)
        Institute for Public Health/George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis
        (2)
        Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis
        (3)
        Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Malawi
        (4)
        Department of Community Health, University of Malawi
        (5)
        Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine

        References

        1. Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, De Onis M, Ezzati M, Mathers C, Rivera J: Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 2008, 371:243–260.View Article
        2. West KP Jr: Extent of vitamin A deficiency among preschool children and women of reproductive age. J Nutr 2002, 132:2857S-2866S.
        3. UNICEF: The State of the World's Children 2012. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2012.
        4. WHO: Management of severe malnutrition: a manual for physicians and other senior health workers. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999.
        5. Ashworth A, Khanum S, Jackson A, CS: Guidelines for the inpatient treatment of severely malnourished children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
        6. Penniston KL, Tanumihardjo SA, CS: The acute and chronic toxic effects of vitamin A. Am J Clin Nutr 2006, 83:191–201.
        7. Villamor E, Fawzi WW: Vitamin A supplementation: implications for morbidity and mortality in children. J Infect Dis 2000, 182:S122–133.View Article
        8. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Haugh MC, Henry D, et al.: Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004, 328:1490.View Article
        9. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, Alonso-Coello P, Falck-Ytter Y, Jaeschke R, Vist G: GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol 2011, 64:1303–1310.View Article
        10. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, Alonso-Coello P, Glasziou P, Jaeschke R, Akl EA: GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 2011, 64:1294–1302.View Article
        11. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D, Devereaux PJ, Montori VM, Freyschuss B, Vist G: GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol 2011, 64:1283–1293.View Article
        12. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Montori V, Akl EA, Djulbegovic B, Falck-Ytter Y: GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol 2011, 64:407–415.View Article
        13. Imdad A, Yakoob MY, Sudfeld C, Haider BA, Black RE, Bhutta ZA: Impact of vitamin A supplementation on infant and childhood mortality. BMC Publ Health 2011, 11 Suppl 3:S20.View Article
        14. Ashour MN, Salem SI, El-Gadban HM, Elwan NM, Basu TK: Antioxidant status in children with protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) living in Cairo, Egypt. Eur J Clin Nutr 1999, 53:669–673.View Article
        15. De Fatima Costa Caminha M, Da Silva Diniz A, Falbo AR, De Arruda IK, Serva VB, De Albuquerque LL, De Freitas Lola MM, Ebrahim GJ: Serum retinol concentrations in hospitalized severe protein-energy malnourished children. J Trop Pediatr 2008, 54:248–252.View Article
        16. Donnen P, Brasseur D, Dramaix M, Vertongen F, Ngoy B, Zihindula M, Hennart P: Vitamin A deficiency and protein-energy malnutrition in a sample of pre-school age children in the Kivu Province in Zaire. Eur J Clin Nutr 1996, 50:456–461.
        17. Mahalanabis D: Breast feeding and vitamin A deficiency among children attending a diarrhoea treatment centre in Bangladesh: a case–control study. BMJ 1991, 303:493–496.View Article
        18. Mitra AK, Alvarez JO, Wahed MA, Fuchs GJ, Stephensen CB: Predictors of serum retinol in children with shigellosis. Am J Clin Nutr 1998, 68:1088–1094.
        19. Sattar S, Ahmed T, Rasul CH, Saha D, Salam MA, Hossain MI: Efficacy of a high-dose in addition to daily low-dose vitamin A in children suffering from severe acute malnutrition with other illnesses. PloS ONE 2012, 7:e33112.View Article
        20. Donnen P, Brasseur D, Dramaix M, Vertongen F, Zihindula M, Muhamiriza M, Hennart P: Vitamin A supplementation but not deworming improves growth of malnourished preschool children in eastern Zaire. J Nutr 1998, 128:1320–1327.
        21. Hussey GD, Klein M: A randomized, controlled trial of vitamin A in children with severe measles. N Engl J Med 1990, 323:160–164.View Article
        22. Coutsoudis A, Broughton M, Coovadia HM: Vitamin A supplementation reduces measles morbidity in young African children: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Am J Clin Nutr 1991, 54:890–895.
        23. Dibley MJ, Sadjimin T, Kjolhede CL, Moulton LH: Vitamin A supplementation fails to reduce incidence of acute respiratory illness and diarrhea in preschool-age Indonesian children. J Nutr 1996, 126:434–442.
        24. Nacul LC, Kirkwood BR, Arthur P, Morris SS, Magalhaes M, Fink MC: Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled clinical trial of efficacy of vitamin A treatment in non-measles childhood pneumonia. BMJ 1997, 315:505–510.View Article
        25. Si NV, Grytter C, Vy NN, Hue NB, Pedersen FK: High dose vitamin A supplementation in the course of pneumonia in Vietnamese children. Acta Paediatr 1997, 86:1052–1055.View Article
        26. Donnen P, Dramaix M, Brasseur D, Bitwe R, Vertongen F, Hennart P: Randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of the effect of a single high dose or daily low doses of vitamin A on the morbidity of hospitalized, malnourished children. Am J Clin Nutr 1998, 68:1254–1260.
        27. Hossain S, Biswas R, Kabir I, Sarker S, Dibley M, Fuchs G, Mahalanabis D: Single dose vitamin A treatment in acute shigellosis in Bangladesh children: randomised double blind controlled trial. BMJ 1998, 316:422–426.View Article
        28. Stephensen CB, Franchi LM, Hernandez H, Campos M, Gilman RH, Alvarez JO: Adverse effects of high-dose vitamin A supplements in children hospitalized with pneumonia. Pediatrics 1998, 101:E3.View Article
        29. Faruque AS, Mahalanabis D, Haque SS, Fuchs GJ, Habte D: Double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of zinc or vitamin A supplementation in young children with acute diarrhoea. Acta Paediatr 1999, 88:154–160.View Article
        30. Julien MR, Gomes A, Varandas L, Rodrigues P, Malveiro F, Aguiar P, Kolsteren P, Stuyft P, Hildebrand K, Labadarios D, Ferrinho P: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of vitamin A in Mozambican children hospitalized with nonmeasles acute lower respiratory tract infections. Trop Med Int Health 1999, 4:794–800.View Article
        31. Fawzi WW, Mbise R, Spiegelman D, Fataki M, Hertzmark E, Ndossi G: Vitamin A supplements and diarrheal and respiratory tract infections among children in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. J Pediatr 2000, 137:660–667.View Article
        32. Mahalanabis D, Lahiri M, Paul D, Gupta S, Gupta A, Wahed MA, Khaled MA: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of the efficacy of treatment with zinc or vitamin A in infants and young children with severe acute lower respiratory infection. Am J Clin Nutr 2004, 79:430–436.
        33. Donnen P, Sylla A, Dramaix M, Sall G, Kuakuvi N, Hennart P: Effect of daily low dose of vitamin A compared with single high dose on morbidity and mortality of hospitalized mainly malnourished children in Senegal: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 2007, 61:1393–1399.View Article
        34. Jain MK, Mehta NJ, Fonseca M, Pai NV: Correlation of serum vitamin A and its transport protein (RBP) in malnourished and vitamin A deficient children. J Postgrad Med 1990, 36:119–123.
        35. Rosales FJ, Ritter SJ, Zolfaghari R, Smith JE, Ross AC: Effects of acute inflammation on plasma retinol, retinol-binding protein, and its mRNA in the liver and kidneys of vitamin A-sufficient rats. J Lipid Res 1996, 37:962–971.
        36. Semba RD, Ward BJ, Griffin DE, Scott AL, Natadisastra G, West KP Jr, Sommer A, Muhilal: Abnormal T-cell subset proportions in vitamin-A-deficient children. Lancet 1993, 341:5–8.View Article
        37. Daulaire NM, Starbuck ES, Houston RM, Church MS, Stukel TA, Pandey MR: Childhood mortality after a high dose of vitamin A in a high risk population. BMJ 1992, 304:207–210.View Article
        38. Kjolhede CL, Chew FJ, Gadomski AM, Marroquin DP: Clinical trial of vitamin A as adjuvant treatment for lower respiratory tract infections. J Pediatr 1995, 126:807–812.View Article
        39. Trehan I, O’Hare BA, Phiri A, Heikens GT: Challenges in the Management of HIV-Infected Malnourished Children in Sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS Research and Treatment 2012, 2012:790786.View Article
        40. Manary MJ, Sandige HL: Management of acute moderate and severe childhood malnutrition. BMJ 2008, 337:1227–1230.View Article
        41. Trehan I, Goldbach HS, LaGrone LN, Meuli GJ, Wang RJ, Maleta KM, Manary MJ: Antibiotics as part of the management of severe acute malnutrition. N Engl J Med 2013, 368:425–435.View Article
        42. WHO: Community-based management of severe acute malnutrition. Geneva: World Health Organization, World Food Programme, United Nations System Standing Committee on Nutrition, United Nations Children’s Fund; 2007.
        43. Creek KE, St Hilaire P, Hodam JR: A comparison of the uptake, metabolism and biologic effects of retinol delivered to human keratinocytes either free or bound to serum retinol-binding protein. J Nutr 1993, 123:356–361.
        44. Celik M, Sermatov K, Abuhandan M, Zeyrek D, Kocyigit A, Iscan A: Oxidative status and DNA damage in chidren with marasmic malnutrition. J Clin Lab Anal 2012, 26:161–166.View Article
        45. Yang H, De Onis M: Algorithms for converting estimates of child malnutrition based on the NCHS reference into estimates based on the WHO Child Growth Standards. BMC Pediatr 2008, 8:19.View Article

        Copyright

        © Iannotti et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

        This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.