Effectiveness of the National Program of Complementary Feeding for older adults in Chile on vitamin B12 status in older adults; secondary outcome analysis from the CENEX Study (ISRCTN48153354)
© Sanchez et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 18 December 2012
Accepted: 31 July 2013
Published: 9 September 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Dec 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mary rose Sweeney|
|30 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - G Oakley Jr.|
|11 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Hugo Sanchez|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mary rose Sweeney|
|10 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Hugo Sanchez|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|10 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mary rose Sweeney|
|18 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Hugo Sanchez|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|18 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|31 Jul 2013||Editorially accepted|
|9 Sep 2013||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-12-124|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.