The relationship between baseline nutritional status with subsequent parenteral nutrition and clinical outcomes in cancer patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
© Vashi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 10 April 2013
Accepted: 12 August 2013
Published: 14 August 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Apr 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Neeraj Chawla|
|24 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gabriel Glockzin|
|9 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Digant Gupta|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Neeraj Chawla|
|17 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gabriel Glockzin|
|25 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Digant Gupta|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|25 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Aug 2013||Editorially accepted|
|14 Aug 2013||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-12-118|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.