Subjective satiety and other experiences of a Paleolithic diet compared to a diabetes diet in patients with type 2 diabetes
© Jönsson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 7 May 2013
Accepted: 23 July 2013
Published: 29 July 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 May 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Axel Carlsson|
|6 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - lynda frassetto|
|14 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kerin O'Dea|
|27 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Tommy Jönsson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - lynda frassetto|
|8 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kerin O'Dea|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Jul 2013||Editorially accepted|
|29 Jul 2013||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-12-105|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.