Fruits and vegetables intake and characteristics associated among adolescents from Southern Brazil
© Rieth et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 15 December 2011
Accepted: 8 November 2012
Published: 16 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jalila El Ati|
|9 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Renata Levy|
|30 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Sandra Fuchs|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jalila El Ati|
|19 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Renata Levy|
|7 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Sandra Fuchs|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|4 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Renata Levy|
|4 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Sandra Fuchs|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|4 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|8 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|16 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-11-95|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.