Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparison of menaquinone-4 and menaquinone-7 bioavailability in healthy women

Nutrition Journal201211:93

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-93

Received: 17 July 2012

Accepted: 3 November 2012

Published: 12 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Toshiro Sato
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maret Traber
20 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nina Emaus
22 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hiroyuki Sumi
22 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Toshiro Sato
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
31 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maret Traber
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
3 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
12 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1475-2891-11-93

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Fine Chemical Laboratory, J-OIL MILLS, INC
(2)
Department of Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University Maastricht
(3)
Laboratory of Physiological Nutrition, Kagawa Nutrition University

Advertisement