Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Reliability and relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire to assess food group intakes in New Zealand adolescents

  • Jyh Eiin Wong1, 2,
  • Winsome R Parnell1,
  • Katherine E Black1 and
  • Paula ML Skidmore1Email author
Nutrition Journal201211:65

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-65

Received: 8 June 2012

Accepted: 31 August 2012

Published: 5 September 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
8 Jun 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kenji Wakai
21 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jane Watson
3 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Paula Skidmore
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kenji Wakai
29 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jane Watson
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
31 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
5 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1475-2891-11-65

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Human Nutrition, University of Otago
School of Healthcare Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia