Validation of digital photographs, as a tool in 24-h recall, for the improvement of dietary assessment among rural populations in developing countries
© Lazarte et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 27 March 2012
Accepted: 26 July 2012
Published: 29 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emma Foster|
|18 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janine Higgins|
|29 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yue Cheng|
|6 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - DA-HONG WANG|
|2 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Claudia E Lazarte Pardo|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|3 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - DA-HONG WANG|
|4 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emma Foster|
|8 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yue Cheng|
|9 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janine Higgins|
|20 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Claudia E Lazarte Pardo|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|20 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|26 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|29 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-11-61|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.