Ready to Use Therapeutic Foods (RUTF) improves undernutrition among ART-treated, HIV-positive children in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

  • Bruno F Sunguya1,

    Affiliated with

    • Krishna C Poudel1, 2Email author,

      Affiliated with

      • Linda B Mlunde1,

        Affiliated with

        • Keiko Otsuka1,

          Affiliated with

          • Junko Yasuoka1,

            Affiliated with

            • David P Urassa3,

              Affiliated with

              • Namala P Mkopi4 and

                Affiliated with

                • Masamine Jimba1

                  Affiliated with

                  Nutrition Journal201211:60

                  DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-60

                  Received: 24 April 2012

                  Accepted: 24 August 2012

                  Published: 29 August 2012

                  Abstract

                  Background

                  HIV/AIDS is associated with an increased burden of undernutrition among children even under antiretroviral therapy (ART). To treat undernutrition, WHO endorsed the use of Ready to Use Therapeutic Foods (RUTF) that can reduce case fatality and undernutrition among ART-naïve HIV-positive children. However, its effects are not studied among ART-treated, HIV-positive children. Therefore, we examined the association between RUTF use with underweight, wasting, and stunting statuses among ART-treated HIV-positive children in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

                  Methods

                  This cross-sectional study was conducted from September-October 2010. The target population was 219 ART-treated, HIV-positive children and the same number of their caregivers. We used questionnaires to measure socio-economic factors, food security, RUTF-use, and ART-duration. Our outcome variables were underweight, wasting, and stunting statuses.

                  Results

                  Of 219 ART-treated, HIV-positive children, 140 (63.9%) had received RUTF intervention prior to the interview. The percentages of underweight and wasting among non-RUTF-receivers were 12.4% and 16.5%; whereas those of RUTF-receivers were 3.0% (P = 0.006) and 2.8% (P = 0.001), respectively. RUTF-receivers were less likely to have underweight (Adjusted Odd Ratio (AOR) =0.19, CI: 0.04, 0.78), and wasting (AOR = 0.24, CI: 0.07, 0.81), compared to non RUTF-receivers. Among RUTF receivers, children treated for at least four months (n = 84) were less likely to have underweight (P = 0.049), wasting (P = 0.049) and stunting (P < 0.001).

                  Conclusions

                  Among HIV-positive children under ART, the provision of RUTF for at least four months was associated with low proportions of undernutrition status. RUTF has a potential to improve undernutrition among HIV-positive children under ART in the clinical settings in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

                  Keywords

                  Undernutrition Ready-to-use therapeutic food HIV/AIDS Tanzania

                  Background

                  Management of undernutrition among HIV-positive children is complicated. This is mostly due to a weakened immunity [1] which leads to a higher case fatality rate even under the standard treatment guidelines [2]. To improve and maintain better nutritional status, the World Health Organization (WHO) encouraged the use of Ready to Use Therapeutic Foods (RUTF) for community-based treatment of severe undernutrition [3, 4]. RUTF is energy-dense lipid paste made of peanut butter, milk powder, oil, sugar, minerals, vitamin, and protein mix [5].

                  Among RUTF-treated children, severe undernutrition status can be improved among hospitalized antiretroviral therapy (ART) naïve HIV-positive children [6]. Compared with HIV-negative children, the case fatality rate is higher among hospitalized ART naïve HIV-positive children [7, 8]; however, community-based RUTF treatment of the ART-naïve HIV-positive children, particularly with severe undernutrition without complications, is known to be associated with a better survival [9].

                  The combination of RUTF and ART treatments might improve undernutrition and reduce case fatality rates among HIV-positive children. This is because ART improves immunity, reduces energy loss, and may improve child’s appetite to food [1012]. So far, only a handful of studies have evaluated the effectiveness of each intervention separately and only one has shown that the initiation of RUTF and ART may improve wasting status among HIV-positive children [13]. In this study, prompt initiation of ART among patients treated with RUTF was associated with weight gain. However, this study focused on wasting alone and the association of RUTF treatment duration and nutrition statuses were not examined.

                  Tanzania is one of the countries hardest hit by both HIV/AIDS and child undernutrition. In 2009, HIV prevalence was 5.9% in Tanzania [14]. In the general population, 47.8% of children are stunted, 24.5% are underweight, and more than 4.5% are wasted [15]. ART program has been expanded in Tanzania [14]. However, ART-treated, HIV-positive children continue to suffer from underweight and wasting [16]. For example, 22.1% and 13.6% of ART-treated, HIV-positive children were underweight and wasted, respectively, in Dar es Salaam [16].

                  To ameliorate such high undernutrition rate, Ministry of Health and other development partners established the RUTF intervention in selected HIV/AIDS Care and Treatment Centers (CTCs) as a pilot intervention in Tanzania. Although studies among ART naïve populations showed effectiveness of RUTF, we could not find similar studies among ART-treated children elsewhere. Furthermore, since the start of RUTF intervention as a pilot project in Tanzania, no studies have evaluated its efficacy among ART-treated HIV-positive children. Therefore, we conducted this study to examine the association of RUTF intervention with stunting, wasting, and underweight statuses among the ART-treated, HIV-positive children in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

                  Methods

                  We conducted this cross sectional study in Dar es Salaam, where HIV prevalence was 8.9% in 2009. It accounts for about 300,000 people living with HIV/AIDS. The city has 44 HIV/AIDS care and treatment centers (CTCs) which provide ART programs to care about 4,000 children [14].

                  Participants and selection criteria

                  Participants of this study included pairs of 219 under-five ART-treated, HIV-positive children and their caregivers. These children were attending CTCs that provide RUTF treatment to severe undernourished children. In Dar es Salaam, a total of six out of 44 CTCs provide RUTF to such children. We excluded the CTC of the Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH). MNH is the referral center for complicated cases from the Northern zone and beyond. Being the highest tertiary hospital, its CTC also cares for more complicated and severe cases from the outside of the region. As a result, we selected five CTCs: Amana, Temeke, Mwananyamala, IDC, and Pasada CTCs. Children under five years of age in the selected CTCs totaled 1719. Amana CTC registered 350 children, Temeke CTC 396, IDC 250, Pasada 373, and Mwananyamala 350.

                  Of the total, about 58% of the children enrolled in CTCs were on ART. We excluded children with missing medical and ART-related information and those whose parents did not consent to participate in the study. We selected each alternative participant of this study from the list of the eligible participants (n = 670). We used Epi-Info Version 6 (CDC, Atlanta, USA) to calculate the minimum required sample size. We estimated that the ratio of children exposed to RUTF to those who were not exposed to RUTF in the intervention clinics to be 2:1. The proportion of underweight among ART-treated HIV-positive children was considered at 13.6% [16]. We therefore estimated the minimum sample size at the power of 80 and with 95% CI to be 173 (115 RUTF treated and 53 RUTF naïve HIV-positive children under ART). In this study, we collected the data of 219 ART treated HIV-positive children (140 RUTF treated and 79 RUTF naïve HIV-positive children under ART).

                  We defined ART-treated HIV-positive children as children whose sero-status was confirmed to be positive using standard laboratory methods and were taking Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART). According to the national guidelines for pediatric HIV/AIDS care in Tanzania, children are typically treated with a combination therapy consisting of three antiretroviral medicines, hence HAART [17].

                  RUTF intervention

                  RUTF Plumpynut® is given to children with severe wasting (Weight-for-height Z-score (WHZ) < −3SD) or underweight (Weight-for-age Z-score (WAZ) < −3SD) or both severe wasting and underweight [18]. Such children are treated with the recommended dosage of 200 kilocalories per kilogram per day until they reach the target weight, which should be in 6 to 10 weeks [5]. RUTF is a community-based intervention given to undernourished children who have no other clinical complications [3, 9, 19]. In this study, 140 HIV ART-treated, HIV-positive children who fulfilled the criteria received RUTF.

                  Measures

                  We measured children’s weight by two methods. For children who could not stand alone, we used a standardized hanging Salter scale® (UK) calibrated to 0.1 kg. For children who could stand alone we used a standardized Seka® digital scale (Brooklyn, USA). We measured height for the 24 months and older children [20] using a Seka® measuring rod calibrated to 0.5 cm. We used the same measure on a board for the children who were less than 24 months, and took their lengths in a recumbent position [20]. We converted height and weight into height-for-age z-score (HAZ), weight-for-age z-score (WAZ), and weight-for-height z-score (WHZ) [21] by the Epi-Info ENA Ver. 3.5.1, 2008 (CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA) software, using WHO reference values [22, 23].

                  Low HAZ, WAZ, and WHZ are the measures of stunting, underweight, and wasting, respectively [24]. Stunting reflects a chronic failure to receive adequate quality and quantity of nutrition over a long period of time; it may also signify a chronic recurrent illness [25]. Stunting therefore may be reflected by failure to attain normal height for the age of a normal child [24, 26]. Wasting in most cases signifies an acute or recent and severe process of weight loss, which is associated with acute starvation or severe disease with nutritional deficit [25]. Underweight is also a measure of acute undernutrition, but is not as robust as wasting in this regard, since the child may be underweight because of stunting, wasting or both [27].

                  According to the WHO Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition, an abnormal anthropometry is defined as a value of Z-score below −2 Standard Deviation (SD) or above +2SD. Z-scores less than -2SD are defined as moderate undernutrition, while less than -3SD are defined as severe undernutrition [28]. These cut-off points define the central 95% of the reference distribution as the normality range [28].

                  We adopted the socio-demographic variables pertaining to children and their caregivers from the Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS), women and household questionnaires [15]. Information collected included education level, religion and marital status. We defined a caregiver as child’s caretaker, parent, or a guardian that is involved in child’s routine care and who accompanied the child to the clinic. Education was classified as either: low (up to primary school level) or high (higher than secondary school level). Religions were categorized into two major groups in Tanzania i.e. Christians and Muslims. Marital status was categorized into either currently married or not [15], caregivers who were divorced or widowed at the time of data collection were considered as not currently married.

                  We assessed food security by using the 6-item Household Food Security Scale (HFSS) [29]. HFSS has been used in various settings including the US [30], Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Philippines [31], and the Caribbean [32]. This scale is used to measure household food security by 12-month recall. Characterization is made based on the sum of affirmative responses; two or more affirmatives indicates ‘food insecurity’, while 5 or more affirmatives indicate ‘hunger’. In this study, Cronbach’s alpha for the HFSS was 0.72, with corrected item-total correlation ranging from 0.09 to 0.74.

                  We assessed economic status by using a Weighted Wealth Index incorporating household durable assets ownership such as paraffin lamp, television, radio, telephone, flat iron, refrigerator, bicycle, motor car, farm and electricity; housing and dwelling characteristics, such as main floor materials, house ownership, fuel for lighting and cooking, type of toilet, source of water, feeding characteristics, and household food satisfaction [15]. Then, we constructed dichotomous variables and conducted principle component analysis (PCA) to reduce 42 items to 22 (loaded as factor 1). We also used factor loadings as item weights. We totaled item weights to yield the wealth index for each household [3335].

                  Data collection

                  We hired five nurse counselors and trained them for one day on interviewing technique and questionnaire contents. The first author and trained research assistants pretested the questionnaire. To ensure good interviewing environment, we recruited all research assistants from the clinics and assigned them to conduct data collection. We collected data by face-to-face interview with caregivers and anthropometric measurements of the children attending the clinic between September and October 2010.

                  Data analysis

                  We conducted descriptive analysis using Chi-square test and Independent sample T-tests to compare characteristics and nutrition status of children who were treated versus those who were not treated with RUTF. We conducted multivariate analysis to examine the effectiveness of RUTF on nutritional status of HIV positive children after adjusting other covariates and important confounders including ART treatment duration. Among RUTF treated children, we used bivariate analysis to evaluate the association of undernutrition and RUTF treatment duration; since the proportion of wasting and underweight was small for multivariate regression analysis. We set the statistical significance at P-value <0.05. We conducted analyses using PASW 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).

                  Ethical consideration

                  We obtained ethical clearance from the Ethical Committees of the University of Tokyo and Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences to conduct this study. We also obtained permission to conduct research from health departments and facilities used for the study. Participation was voluntary, and confidentiality was ensured. Caregivers gave the written informed consent before starting the interview.

                  Results

                  Descriptive results

                  Out of 219 HIV positive children recruited for this study, 140 (63.9%) had received the RUTF intervention. Children who received and those who did not receive the intervention did not have any significant difference in age, sex, orphan hood state, and birth weight (Table 1). Caregivers of children who received and those who did not receive the intervention were not different in their mean ages, education level, religion groups, employment and marital status. Households of children in the intervention group did not have differences in wealth index from those who were not in the intervention (P = 0.266). A total of 19 (13.6%) of RUTF treated compared to 13 (16.5%) of RUTF naïve children came from households with food insecurity. Hunger was prevalent in households of 45 (32.8%) RUTF receivers compared to 41 (46.8%) of RUTF naïve children, (P = 0.004). Children in the intervention group received RUTF at the mean duration of about four months.
                  Table 1

                  Descriptive analysis of the study participants (N = 219)

                   

                  RUTF-treated (N = 140)

                  RUTF-naive (N = 79)

                   

                  Variable

                  N

                  Mean

                  %

                  SD

                  N

                  Mean

                  %

                  SD

                  P-Value

                  Age child (Months)

                   

                  37.2

                   

                  15.6

                   

                  36.1

                   

                  17.3

                  0.648

                  Sex

                           

                  Male

                  81

                   

                  57.9

                   

                  42

                   

                  53.2

                   

                  0.502

                  Female

                  59

                   

                  42.1

                   

                  37

                   

                  46.8

                    

                  Orphan hood

                           

                  Yes

                  90

                   

                  64.3

                   

                  41

                   

                  51.9

                   

                  0.099

                  No

                  50

                   

                  35.7

                   

                  38

                   

                  48.1

                    

                  Birth weight

                           

                  ≥ 2500 g

                  110

                   

                  78.6

                   

                  57

                   

                  72.2

                   

                  0.365

                  < 2500 g

                  30

                   

                  21.4

                   

                  22

                   

                  27.8

                    

                  Age caregiver (Years)

                   

                  34.2

                   

                  9.4

                   

                  33.8

                   

                  8.2

                  0.753

                  Caregiver's education

                           

                  ≤ Primary

                  113

                   

                  80.7

                   

                  67

                   

                  84.8

                   

                  0.564

                  ≥ Secondary

                  27

                   

                  19.3

                   

                  12

                   

                  15.2

                    

                  Major religions

                           

                  Muslim

                  88

                   

                  63.3

                   

                  52

                   

                  65.8

                   

                  0.822

                  Christian

                  51

                   

                  36.7

                   

                  27

                   

                  34.2

                    

                  Employment status

                           

                  Unemployed

                  84

                   

                  60.0

                   

                  52

                   

                  65.8

                   

                  0.479

                  Employed

                  56

                   

                  40.0

                   

                  27

                   

                  34.2

                    

                  Marital status caregiver

                           

                  Married

                  95

                   

                  67.9

                   

                  47

                   

                  59.5

                   

                  0.237

                  Not married

                  45

                   

                  32.1

                   

                  32

                   

                  40.5

                    

                  Wealth index (tercile)

                           

                  High

                  36

                   

                  25.7

                   

                  16

                   

                  20.3

                   

                  0.266

                  Middle

                  54

                   

                  38.6

                   

                  26

                   

                  32.9

                    

                  Low

                  50

                   

                  35.7

                   

                  37

                   

                  46.8

                    

                  Food security score

                           

                  Secured

                  76

                   

                  54.3

                   

                  25

                   

                  31.6

                   

                  0.004

                  Insecure

                  19

                   

                  13.6

                   

                  13

                   

                  16.5

                    

                  Hunger

                  45

                   

                  32.1

                   

                  41

                   

                  51.9

                    

                  WAZ (underweight)

                           

                  > − 2SD*

                  136

                   

                  97.2

                   

                  68

                   

                  86.1

                   

                  0.006

                  > − 3SD**

                  2

                   

                  1.4

                   

                  8

                   

                  10.1

                    

                  <−3SD***

                  2

                   

                  1.4

                   

                  3

                   

                  2.3

                    

                  WHZ (wasting)

                           

                  > − 2SD*

                  136

                   

                  97.2

                   

                  191

                   

                  83.5

                   

                  0.001

                  > − 3SD**

                  1

                   

                  0.7

                   

                  18

                   

                  11.4

                    

                  <−3SD***

                  3

                   

                  2.1

                   

                  4

                   

                  5.1

                    

                  HAZ (stunting)

                           

                  > − 2SD*

                  98

                   

                  70.0

                   

                  43

                   

                  54.4

                   

                  0.066

                  > − 3SD**

                  20

                   

                  14.3

                   

                  16

                   

                  20.3

                    

                  <−3SD***

                  22

                   

                  15.7

                   

                  20

                   

                  25.3

                    

                  * Normal, ** Moderate, *** Severe.

                  Nutrition status

                  Table 1 also shows the descriptive analysis of nutrition status. At the time of data collection, 97.2% of RUTF treated children had a normal weight-for-age compared to 86.1% of RUTF naïve children (P = 0.006). Compared to 83.5% of RUTF naïve children, 97.1% of RUTF treated children had a normal weight-for-height (P = 0.002). Though a statistically significant difference was not detected, RUTF treated children had a lower proportion of moderate to severe stunting compared to RUTF-naïve children (30.0% vs. 45.6%, P = 0.066).

                  Effectiveness of RUTF on nutrition status of ART-treated HIV-positive children

                  Table 2 shows the results of adjusted analyses on effectiveness of RUTF. ART-treated HIV-positive children who received RUTF were less likely to have underweight status (AOR 0.19, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.78, P = 0.021) and wasting status (AOR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.81, P = 0.021) compared to RUTF naïve ART-treated HIV-positive children. No significant difference was found on stunting risk between children who received RUTF and those who did not receive it in the adjusted analysis (AOR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.41, 1.57, P = 0.511). Other factors associated with risk of underweight included male sex, lower economical status, food insecurity, and lower birth weight. Besides the RUTF intervention, wasting was also associated with lower birth weight, low economic status, and food insecurity. In this study, stunting was associated with only household’s hunger.
                  Table 2

                  Multiple logistic regression; effectiveness of RUTF among HIV positive children

                  Variable

                  WAZ < −2SD

                  WHZ < −2SD

                  HAZ < −2SD

                   

                  AOR

                  95% C.I. for AOR

                  P-Value

                  AOR

                  95% C.I. for AOR

                  P-Value

                  AOR

                  95% C.I. for AOR

                  P-Value

                    

                  Lower

                  Upper

                    

                  Lower

                  Upper

                    

                  Lower

                  Upper

                   

                  RUTF

                              

                  No

                  1.00

                     

                  1.00

                     

                  1.00

                     

                  Yes

                  0.19

                  0.04

                  0.78

                  0.021

                  0.24

                  0.07

                  0.81

                  0.021

                  0.80

                  0.41

                  1.57

                  0.511

                  Age (Ref <38 months)

                  0.96

                  0.21

                  4.38

                  0.960

                  0.44

                  0.12

                  1.66

                  0.225

                  0.72

                  0.35

                  1.50

                  0.379

                  Sex

                              

                  Male

                  1.00

                     

                  1.00

                     

                  1.00

                     

                  Female

                  0.14

                  0.03

                  0.70

                  0.016

                  0.96

                  0.30

                  3.04

                  0.944

                  1.44

                  0.75

                  2.77

                  0.271

                  Birth weight

                              

                  ≥ 2500

                  1.00

                     

                  1.00

                     

                  1.00

                     

                  < 2500

                  4.77

                  1.16

                  19.67

                  0.031

                  4.88

                  1.52

                  15.63

                  0.008

                  1.66

                  0.80

                  3.45

                  0.176

                  Caregiver's education

                              

                  ≤ Primary

                  1.00

                     

                  1.00

                     

                  1.00

                     

                  ≥ Secondary

                  0.11

                  0.01

                  1.28

                  0.077

                  0.41

                  0.08

                  2.22

                  0.300

                  0.84

                  0.36

                  1.97

                  0.687

                  ART duration

                              

                  ≤12 months

                  1.00

                     

                  1.00

                     

                  1.00

                     

                  >12 months

                  2.79

                  0.51

                  15.16

                  0.235

                  0.91

                  0.24

                  3.44

                  0.885

                  1.40

                  0.60

                  3.26

                  0.435

                  Employment status

                              

                  Un employed

                  1.00

                     

                  1.00

                     

                  1.00

                     

                  Employed

                  0.56

                  0.12

                  2.56

                  0.451

                  2.35

                  0.56

                  6.93

                  0.296

                  0.59

                  0.29

                  1.20

                  0.146

                  Economic status

                              

                  Low

                  1.00

                     

                  1.00

                     

                  1.00

                     

                  High

                  0.06

                  0.01

                  0.36

                  0.002

                  0.28

                  0.08

                  0.98

                  0.047

                  1.33

                  0.67

                  2.62

                  0.410

                  Food security

                              

                  Secured

                  1.00

                     

                  1.00

                     

                  1.00

                     

                  Insecure

                  16.24

                  1.08

                  244.43

                  0.044

                  10.77

                  1.60

                  72.54

                  0.015

                  1.60

                  0.57

                  4.42

                  0.371

                  Hunger

                  15.99

                  1.70

                  150.56

                  0.015

                  4.55

                  0.87

                  23.99

                  0.074

                  6.93

                  3.35

                  14.33

                  <0.001

                  Adjusted for; Age, Sex, Birth weight, Care giver's education level, ART duration, employment status, House hold wealth and Food Security.

                  Duration of RUTF intervention and the nutrition status of HIV-positive children

                  Table 3 shows the result of bivariate association of RUTF duration and nutritional outcome of ART-treated HIV-positive children. Among children who received RUTF (N = 140), about 18% children remained stunted after four or more months of RUTF intervention compared to about 69% of those who received RUTF intervention in less than four months (P < 0.001). None of children who received RUTF for four or more months had either underweight or wasting.
                  Table 3

                  Bivariate association between RUTF duration and nutrition status

                   

                  <4 months

                  ≥4 months

                  P-Value

                  Nutrition status

                  N

                  %

                  N

                  %

                   

                  HAZ (stunting)

                       
                   

                  > − 2SD*

                  29

                  51.8

                  69

                  82.1

                  <0.001

                   

                  <−2SD**

                  27

                  48.2

                  15

                  17.9

                   

                  WAZ (underweight)

                       
                   

                  > − 2SD*

                  52

                  92.9

                  84

                  100.0

                  0.049

                   

                  <−2SD**

                  4

                  7.1

                  0

                  0.0

                   

                  WHZ (wasting)

                       
                   

                  > − 2SD*

                  52

                  92.9

                  84

                  100.0

                  0.049

                   

                  <−2SD**

                  4

                  7.1

                  0

                  0.0

                   

                  * Normal, ** Moderate, or severe undernutrition.

                  Discussion

                  This study found that RUTF treated HIV-positive children under ART had lower proportions of underweight and wasting compared to RUTF naïve HIV-positive children under ART. Furthermore, children treated by RUTF for at least four months had lower proportions of underweight, wasting, and stunting compared to their counterparts. Our study is the first to show the effect of RUTF treatment duration on both acute and chronic undernutrition in the era of ART scaling up.

                  In this study, about 97% of children treated with RUTF were found to have normal weight-for-age and weight-for-height. This is an important achievement. This is because, all of these children were either severely wasted or underweight or both at the baseline. Compared with RUTF-naïve, the RUTF treated children had a significantly better nutrition status. Such significant achievement of RUTF treatment can be explained as follows. First, RUTF ingredients are energy dense, with lipids and proteins [5], which play an important role to recover the wasted lean tissue [3]. Previous studies also reported the improvement of severe acute undernutrition among ART naïve HIV-positive children treated with RUTF [6, 9]. Second, children have an additional advantage of frequent contact with nutrition specialists [36, 37], in the presence of nutrition supplement interventions [3840]. This might improve their undernutrition status through closer monitoring, follow up, and nutritional and hygienic counseling. In a long run, it may also improve their chronic undernutrition status [37, 38, 41].

                  While our results showed low wasting and underweight proportions among RUTF treated children compared to RUTF naïve children, proportions of stunting were not significantly different among them. Stunting has many persistent determinants including poverty, food insecurity [42, 43], and poor caregivers’ education [44]. To improve this chronic undernutrition, longer treatment duration may be necessary. In our stratified analysis, children who received the treatment for at least four months were less likely to be stunted compared to their counterparts. This may be due to the cumulative effect of the high energy and protein nutrients they obtain from the high energy and protein diet [3], and frequent contact with nutritionist as we have stated above.

                  Apart from RUTF intervention, this study also found other factors associated with undernutrition among ART treated children. These factors include male sex, low birth weight, lower economic status, and food insecurity. Previous study conducted among ART-treated children in Tanzania [16] and among ART naïve HIV-positive children in South Africa [45] also supports these findings.

                  Our results should be interpreted with care owing to some limitations. First, the cross-sectional design would limit direction of causal relationship. Using this design, it may be difficult to examine the effect of food in a population that has high food insecurity. In our multivariate analyses, however, we controlled for food insecurity and other factors that were found to be associated with undernutrition in a previous study in the same region [16]. Moreover, the effectiveness of RUTF has also been shown among HIV-negative children [46, 47] and ART-naïve HIV-positive children in Sub Saharan Africa [6, 7, 9]. According to the treatment protocol, all the children in the intervention group had severe underweight or wasting before the treatment initiation. Second, our results may not be generalized beyond the urban settings where this research was conducted. However, these results may be considered in the townships or cities in Tanzania or countries in the region with similar socio-economic characteristics.

                  In conclusion, among HIV-positive children under ART, provision of RUTF was associated with low proportions of wasting and underweight statuses. Furthermore, RUTF treatment for at least four months was associated with lower proportions of underweight, wasting and stunting. This result suggests that supplementation with RUTF at least for four months has a potential to improve undernutrition among HIV-positive children under ART in the clinical settings. RUTF may be useful in countries like Tanzania and others with high proportion of undernutrition among ART-treated HIV-positive children [16]. It is therefore important to consider scaling up the RUTF intervention in the same pace as ART programs in Tanzania and other countries in the region.

                  Abbreviations

                  AIDS: 

                  Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

                  AOR: 

                  Adjusted odd ratio

                  ART: 

                  Antiretroviral therapy

                  CI: 

                  Confidence interval

                  CTC: 

                  Care and treatment center

                  ENA: 

                  Emergency nutrition assessment

                  HAZ: 

                  Height for age z-score

                  HFSS: 

                  Household food security scale

                  HIV: 

                  Human immunodeficiency virus

                  PCA: 

                  Principal component analysis

                  RUTF: 

                  Ready to use therapeutic foods

                  TDHS: 

                  Tanzania demographic and health survey

                  WAZ: 

                  Weight for age z-score

                  WHO: 

                  World Health Organization

                  WHZ: 

                  Weight for height z-score.

                  Declarations

                  Acknowledgements

                  The authors gratefully acknowledge all the participants, research assistants, and medical officers in-charge of the health facilities where we conducted this study. Part of this study was supported by the fund of “Overseas Young Researchers’ Grant” of the School of International Health, The University of Tokyo.

                  Authors’ Affiliations

                  (1)
                  Department of Community and Global Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
                  (2)
                  School of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University
                  (3)
                  School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences
                  (4)
                  Department of Pediatric and Child Health, Muhimbili National Hospital

                  References

                  1. Bachou H, Labadarios D: The nutrition situation in Uganda. Nutrition 2002, 18:356–358.View Article
                  2. Heikens GT, Bunn J, Amadi B, Manary M, Chhagan M, Berkley JA, Rollins N, Kelly P, Adamczick C, Maitland K, Tomkins A: Case management of HIV-infected severely malnourished children: challenges in the area of highest prevalence. Lancet 2008, 371:1305–1307.View Article
                  3. WHO: Community-Based Management of Severe Acute Malnutrition. WHO, Geneva; 2007.
                  4. WHO: Nutrition and HIV/AIDS. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2005.
                  5. Ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF)http://​www.​nutriset.​fr/​en/​product-range/​produit-par-produit/​plumpynut-ready-to-use-therapeutic-food-rutf.​html
                  6. Fergusson P, Chinkhumba J, Grijalva-Eternod C, Banda T, Mkangama C, Tomkins A: Nutritional recovery in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected children with severe acute malnutrition. Arch Dis Child 2009, 94:512–516.View Article
                  7. Ndekha M, Manary M, Ashorn P, Briend A: Home-based therapy with ready-to-use therapeutic food is of benefit to malnourished, HIV-infected Malawian children. Acta Paediatr 2005, 94:222–225.View Article
                  8. Sandige H, Ndekha M, Briend A, Ashorn P, Manary M: Home-based treatment of malnourished Malawian children with locally produced or imported ready-to-use food. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2004, 39:141–146.View Article
                  9. Sadler K, Kerac M, Collins S, Khengere H, Nesbitt A: Improving the management of severe acute malnutrition in an area of high HIV prevalence. J Trop Pediatr 2008, 54:364–369.View Article
                  10. Berkley J, Bejon P, Mwangi T, Gwer S, Maitland K, Williams T, Mohammed S, Osier F, Kinyanjui S, Fegan G, Lowe BS, English M, Peshu N, Marsh K, Newton CR: HIV infection, malnutrition, and invasive bacterial infection among children with severe malaria. Clin Infect Dis 2009, 49:336–343.View Article
                  11. Bachou H, Tylleskär T, Downing R, Tumwine J: Severe malnutrition with and without HIV-1 infection in hospitalised children in Kampala, Uganda: differences in clinical features, haematological findings and CD4+ cell counts. Nutr J 2006, 5:27.View Article
                  12. Yeung S, Wilkinson D, Escott S, Gilks C: Paediatric HIV infection in a rural South African district hospital. J Trop Pediatr 2000, 46:107–110.View Article
                  13. Kim MH, Cox C, Dave A, Draper HR, Kabue M, Schutze GE, Ahmed S, Kazembe PN, Kline MW, Manary M: Prompt initiation of ART With therapeutic food is associated with improved outcomes in HIV-infected Malawian children with malnutrition. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2012, 59:173–176.View Article
                  14. NACP: HIV/AIDS/STI Surveillance Report no 21. Ministry of Health. Tanzania Mainland. National AIDS Control Programme (NACP), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; 2009.
                  15. NBS, ORC-Macro: Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey 2009–2010. National Bureau of Statistics and ORC Macro, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; 2010.
                  16. Sunguya BF, Poudel KC, Otsuka K, Yasuoka J, Mlunde LB, Urassa DP, Mkopi NP, Jimba M: Undernutrition among HIV-positive children in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: antiretroviral therapy alone is not enough. BMC Publ Health 2011, 11:869.View Article
                  17. NACP: National guideline for management of HIV/AIDS. 3rd edition. Ministry of Health. National AIDS Control Programme (NACP), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; 2009.
                  18. Briend A, Lacsala R, Prudhon C, Mounier B, Grellety Y, Golden MH: Ready-to-use therapeutic food for treatment of marasmus. Lancet 1999, 353:1767–1768.View Article
                  19. Collins S: Changing the way we address severe malnutrition during famine. Lancet 2001, 358:498–501.View Article
                  20. Roche AF, Davila GH: Differences between recumbent length and stature within individuals. Growth 1974, 38:313–320.
                  21. Dibley MJ, Staehling N, Nieburg P, Trowbridge FL: Interpretation of Z-score anthropometric indicators derived from the international growth reference. Am J Clin Nutr 1987, 46:749–762.
                  22. WHO: A growth chart for international use in maternal and child health care. World Health Organization, Geneva; 1978.
                  23. Van den Broeck J, Willie D, Younger N: The World Health Organization child growth standards: expected implications for clinical and epidemiological research. Eur J Pediatr 2009, 168:247–251.View Article
                  24. WHO: Multicenter Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length, weight and age. Acta Paediatrica 2006, 450:76–84.
                  25. Caulfield LE, Richard SA, Rivera JA, Musgrove P, Black RE: Stunting, Wasting and Micronutrient Deficiency Disorder. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. 2nd edition. World Bank, Washington, D.C.; 2006.
                  26. WHO: Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group: WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/Height-for-Age, Weight-for-Age, Weight-for-Length, Weight-for-Height and Body Mass Index-for-Age: Methods and Development. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2006.
                  27. de Onis M, Onyango AW, Van den Broeck J, Chumlea WC, Martorell R: Measurement and standardization protocols for anthropometry used in the construction of a new international growth reference. Food Nutr Bull 2004, 25:S27–36.
                  28. WHO: Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group: WHO Child Growth Standards: Growth Velocity Based on Weight, Length and Head Circumference: Methods and Development. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2009.
                  29. Blumberg S, Bialostosky K, Hamilton W, Briefel R: The effectiveness of a short form of the Household Food Security Scale. Am J Public Health 1999, 89:1231–1234.View Article
                  30. Frongillo EJ: Validation of measures of food insecurity and hunger. J Nutr 1999, 129:506S-509S.
                  31. Melgar-Quinonez H, Zubieta A, MkNelly B, Nteziyaremye A, Gerardo M, Dunford C: Household food insecurity and food expenditure in Bolivia, Burkina Faso, And the Philippines. J Nutr 2006, 136:1431S-1437S.
                  32. Gulliford MC, Mahabir D, Rocke B: Reliability and validity of a short form household food security scale in a Caribbean community. BMC Publ Health 2004, 4:22.View Article
                  33. Howe DL, Hargreaves RJ, Huttly RS: Issues in the construction of wealth indices for the measurement of socio-economic position in low-income countries. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 2008, 5:3.View Article
                  34. Gwatkin DR, Rutstein S, Johnson K, Pande RP, Wagstaff A: Socio-Economic Difference in Health, Nutrition and Population in Ghana. HNP/Poverty Thematic Group of the World Bank. World Bank, Washington, D.C.; 2000.
                  35. Vyas S, Kumaranayake L: Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan 2006, 21:459–468.View Article
                  36. Santos I, Victora CG, Martines J, Gonçalves H, Gigante DP, Valle NJ, Pelto G: Nutrition counseling increases weight gain among Brazilian children. J Nutr 2001, 131:2866–2873.
                  37. Shi L, Zhang J: Recent evidence of the effectiveness of educational interventions for improving complementary feeding practices in developing countries. J Trop Pediatr 2011, 57:91–98.View Article
                  38. Imdad A, Yakoob M, Bhutta Z: Impact of maternal education about complementary feeding and provision of complementary foods on child growth in developing countries. BMC Publ Health 2011,11(Suppl 3):S25.View Article
                  39. Roy S, Fuchs G, Mahmud Z, Ara G, Islam S, Shafique S, Akter S, Chakraborty B: Intensive nutrition education with or without supplementary feeding improves the nutritional status of moderately-malnourished children in Bangladesh. J Heal Popul Nutr 2005, 23:320–330.
                  40. Pelto GH, Santos I, Gonçalves H, Victora C, Martines J, Habicht JP: Nutrition counseling training changes physician behavior and improves caregiver knowledge acquisition. J Nutr 2004, 134:357–362.
                  41. Phuka JC, Maleta K, Thakwalakwa C, Cheung YB, Briend A, Manary MJ, Ashorn P: Complementary feeding with fortified spread and incidence of severe stunting in 6- to 18-month-old rural Malawians. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008, 162:619–626.View Article
                  42. Ivers LC, Cullen KA, Freedberg KA, Block S, Coates J, Webb P: HIV/AIDS, undernutrition, and food insecurity. Clin Infect Dis 2009, 49:1096–1102.View Article
                  43. Normén L, Chan K, Braitstein P, Anema A, Bondy G, Montaner J, Hogg R: Food insecurity and hunger are prevalent among HIV-positive individuals in British Columbia, Canada. J Nutr 2005, 135:820–825.
                  44. Lopman B, Lewis J, Nyamukapa C, Mushati P, Chandiwana S, Gregson S: HIV incidence and poverty in Manicaland, Zimbabwe: is HIV becoming a disease of the poor? AIDS 2007,21(Suppl 7):S57–66.View Article
                  45. Saloojee H, De Maayer T, Garenne M, Kahn K: What's new? Investigating risk factors for severe childhood malnutrition in a high HIV prevalence South African setting. Scand J Public Health Suppl 2007, 69:96–106.View Article
                  46. Isanaka S, Nombela N, Djibo A, Poupard M, Van Beckhoven D, Gaboulaud V, Guerin PJ, Grais RF: Effect of preventive supplementation with ready-to-use therapeutic food on the nutritional status, mortality, and morbidity of children aged 6 to 60 months in Niger: a cluster randomized trial. JAMA 2009, 301:277–285.View Article
                  47. Nackers F, Broillet F, Oumarou D, Djibo A, Gaboulaud V, Guerin P, Rusch B, Grais R, Captier V: Effectiveness of ready-to-use therapeutic food compared to a corn/soy-blend-based pre-mix for the treatment of childhood moderate acute malnutrition in Niger. J Trop Pediatr 2010, 56:407–413.View Article

                  Copyright

                  © Sunguya et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

                  This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                  Advertisement