Associations between toenail arsenic concentration and dietary factors in a New Hampshire population
© Gruber et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 2 September 2011
Accepted: 29 June 2012
Published: 29 June 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Craig Steinmaus|
|23 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tejo Prakash Nagaraja|
|26 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melissa Slotnick|
|27 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Megan Hall|
|1 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Kathryn Cottingham|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melissa Slotnick|
|19 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Megan Hall|
|22 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Craig Steinmaus|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|29 Jun 2012||Article published||10.1186/1475-2891-11-45|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.