Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Coffee consumption and prostate cancer risk: further evidence for inverse relationship

  • Kashif Shafique1Email author,
  • Philip McLoone2,
  • Khaver Qureshi3,
  • Hing Leung3, 4,
  • Carole Hart1 and
  • David S Morrison2
Nutrition Journal201211:42

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-42

Received: 23 February 2012

Accepted: 13 June 2012

Published: 13 June 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
23 Feb 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ishtiaque Ahmaed
14 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Manami Inoue
23 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Kashif Shafique
Resubmission - Version 3
23 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Manami Inoue
26 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ishtiaque Ahmaed
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
13 Jun 2012 Article published 10.1186/1475-2891-11-42

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute of Health & Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, Public Health, University of Glasgow
West of Scotland Cancer Surveillance Unit, University of Glasgow
Urology Department, Gartnavel General Hospital
Beatson Institute for Cancer Research